Associate
I'm proud to be an American, where at least I know I'm free.
Slavery, the raw materials it produced and stripping India fueled and allowed the industrial revolution. That's just basic history. (And im super glad it happened)
The 1948 act was more a formalization of what had already been going on for centuries by that point, including from outside the colonies. The ebb and flow of people, ideas, cultures and languages is part and parcel with being a major trading nation, something Britain has been (to various extents) for much of the last century. It’s the reason our language is so diverse/complicated, why many of our cities were diverse way before the 20th century and why we have such a distinguished scientific past. In many instances we were also the first port of call when someone’s country went to ****.
During that time there has always been dissent and undercurrent of dislike to immigrants and “foreigners”, sometimes, like now, it ends up at the surface. Nothing has changed in reality in this regard.
Yes, of course the country is still one of the most open and tolerant countries. The issue is, from an outsiders perspective, the perception is not of that. People see what is happening: leaving the EU*, rise in hate crime, the rhetoric from the media and politicians, difficulty in the visa process (especially student and skilled worker) etc. and look towards other countries instead.
There are plenty of other countries out there with open and tolerant attitudes, and these are the countries that are going to benefit, especially as the US is also expressing the “we’re closed” sentiment too. Those countries know it too, and are already positioning and advertising themselves to those people that may have seen the UK as the the place to go. Australia, Canada, Denmark, France, Germany etc etc. are all ready and waiting to pounce. For example: https://www.google.ca/amp/s/amp.the...10/fed-up-brexit-britain-come-work-denmark-eu
*Note, pure the one bringing the EU up here. It is one reason, but there’s myriad of reasons why.
The 1948 act was more a formalization of what had already been going on for centuries by that point, including from outside the colonies. The ebb and flow of people, ideas, cultures and languages is part and parcel with being a major trading nation, something Britain has been (to various extents) for much of the last century. It’s the reason our language is so diverse/complicated, why many of our cities were diverse way before the 20th century and why we have such a distinguished scientific past. In many instances we were also the first port of call when someone’s country went to ****.
During that time there has always been dissent and undercurrent of dislike to immigrants and “foreigners”, sometimes, like now, it ends up at the surface. Nothing has changed in reality in this regard.
Yes, of course the country is still one of the most open and tolerant countries. The issue is, from an outsiders perspective, the perception is not of that. People see what is happening: leaving the EU*, rise in hate crime, the rhetoric from the media and politicians, difficulty in the visa process (especially student and skilled worker) etc. and look towards other countries instead.
There are plenty of other countries out there with open and tolerant attitudes, and these are the countries that are going to benefit, especially as the US is also expressing the “we’re closed” sentiment too. Those countries know it too, and are already positioning and advertising themselves to those people that may have seen the UK as the the place to go. Australia, Canada, Denmark, France, Germany etc etc. are all ready and waiting to pounce. For example: https://www.google.ca/amp/s/amp.the...10/fed-up-brexit-britain-come-work-denmark-eu
*Note, pure the one bringing the EU up here. It is one reason, but there’s myriad of reasons why.
I'm not proud to be English or British, I feel an enormous amount of white guilt and quite frankly I'm ashamed and there needs to be more equality.
I would never say that I am proud to be British, I find the idea completely ridiculous. Being proud of being born in a certain country is like being proud of being born a man or a woman. Pride is supposed to be a feeling you have about something that you have actually done, not something you've just been born in to.
That's 'cos you don't live here.I am proud to be British.
Looks like the social conditioning is working!White guilt? What nonsense! What have you got to be guilty about for being white? This is one of the most equal nations in the world.
While I do understand and to a large part subscribe to this view , I don’t think the idea is completely ridiculous. A nation is also about family, and for those whose families have contributed a lot or sacrificed a lot for the advancement/protection of their nation you can see how national pride can become a quite personal matter.
I'm not proud to be English or British, I feel an enormous amount of white guilt and quite frankly I'm ashamed and there needs to be more equality.
Nonsense the immigration prior to 1948 was nothing like what we have seen now where over half the new population every year in the UK is the result of immigration or their children. The desperate attempt to portray the inward migration, especially of the last 20 years, as 'business as usual' for the UK is laughably inept.
A frequent point raised by Brexit supporters is that far from it being a 'no more foreigners' move it would allow the UK to control inward migration allowing only those desirable to the UK to enter rather than the effective free for all we currently have.
Its cringe worthy that you put Australia on your list ... try rocking up there unannounced and you may find yourself in a detention centre in another country. Australia is a huge country with lots of scope for inward migration but it picks and chooses in the main who get in and who doesn't based on the skills of the candidates. The UK would be free to pursue a similar immigration policy after leaving the EU if it wished.
The 2011 census showed only 44.9 percent of Londoners identified themselves as ‘White British’ for example. It doesn’t take a genius to realise that for many people, this is a problem of great concern.
And then...Rome was no different at the very height of its powers (though obviously ~50% Roman rather than British ). It prospered for hundreds of years this way.
Rome was no different at the very height of its powers (though obviously ~50% Roman rather than British ). It prospered for hundreds of years this way.
You've completely missed the point of the post. It’s nothing to do wth current immigration policy, rather the British culture over the centuries (tolerance and openness towards different peoples, cultures and ideas) and the change in perception of the UK on the world stage.
It comes down to the same thing really, I don't feel proud of my parents achievements or their parents achievements. The same way I wouldn't feel guilty or any less proud of myself if I was a son of a Nazi war criminal. I can understand the idea of being proud of being part of a nation if one has made a conscious impact/contribution towards shaping it, but that isn't likely to be the case for 99% of the population.