Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
It pains me to read the word 'couch' so much on a UK forum.
I've just taken a look at the price of that LG TV mentioned above, and at the price!
They do a 55" screen though which might be within my budget.
So even though Pascal cards have HDMI 2.0 Nvidia only enabling this feature for the Turing cards.....ffs.
As above surely something like this much better than playing on your lap.
https://ibb.co/hYVY0q2
Another pic
https://ibb.co/ykq3BCg
Not at all. But in those pics I don't see leg-rest, and that's the difference probably. Having keyboard on lap with like a sofa-chair extended is the most comfortable, even more than on desk for me. I've played around with various setups but this right now is unbeatable for me.
I bought my 65C9 for £2400 a few months ago and am currently attempting to sell my 65C6 for £850
Not understanding what Iv'e been saying with'could have', so I'll leave it there.
Nvidia are using the HDMI VRR function which is a HDMI 2.1 only feature (it's not Freesyncand is currently only really supported by the Xbox One). This could indicate that the HDMI controller on Turing cards is more capable than initially thought. Sony were able to bring HDR support to the original PS4 as even though the HDMI controller had been designed to support the HDMI 1.4 specs, it was engineered to support HDMI 2.0 level bandwidth and a firmware update enabled this. It is not beyond reason that the HDMI controller on Turing parts is capable of meeting HDMI 2.1 requirements whereas the older Pascal based parts are not.So even though Pascal cards have HDMI 2.0 Nvidia only enabling this feature for the Turing cards.....ffs.
Nvidia are using the HDMI VRR function which is a HDMI 2.1 only feature (it's not Freesyncand is currently only really supported by the Xbox One). This could indicate that the HDMI controller on Turing cards is more capable than initially thought. Sony were able to bring HDR support to the original PS4 as even though the HDMI controller had been designed to support the HDMI 1.4 specs, it was engineered to support HDMI 2.0 level bandwidth and a firmware update enabled this. It is not beyond reason that the HDMI controller on Turing parts is capable of meeting HDMI 2.1 requirements whereas the older Pascal based parts are not.
Not everything Nvidia do is evil.
It really wasn't and if you truly believe that it was then you do t really understand the technology at all.
Just because the software solution now works nearly as well as the hardware solution, doesn't make the hardware solution a marketing ploy. It just makes it almost obsolete, well certainly on its last legs anyway.
We had a big heated argument in this very forum not long ago, when I was saying Pascal & Turing on hardware level have the ability to work on Adaptive Sync (aka Freesync) products.
And that Nvidia is just scamming everyone by marketing their expensive module as must have.
You and Gregster were adamant that would never ever be the case....... I can dig the discussions if needed.
Nvidia are using the HDMI VRR function which is a HDMI 2.1 only feature (it's not Freesyncand is currently only really supported by the Xbox One). This could indicate that the HDMI controller on Turing cards is more capable than initially thought. Sony were able to bring HDR support to the original PS4 as even though the HDMI controller had been designed to support the HDMI 1.4 specs, it was engineered to support HDMI 2.0 level bandwidth and a firmware update enabled this. It is not beyond reason that the HDMI controller on Turing parts is capable of meeting HDMI 2.1 requirements whereas the older Pascal based parts are not.
Not everything Nvidia do is evil.
Perhaps, but i'd like to see some proof of the additional capability that the hdmi controller has with Turing cards. As it stands both 1080ti / 2080ti have HDMI 2.0b ports listed in specs, so I am going from that. Would be nice if Nvidia could clarify this, but I doubt they will.
now what you are trying to imply. But, you are still incorrect in your thinking, Maxwell cards could not work with adaptive sync monitors, they don't have the hardware.
We know there was no hardware support onboard.
1 more time, 'could have' had the hardware included in the controller design/hdmi stage on board in stead of not is what you aren't acknowledging I'm saying.
If they needed to they would have on second gen Maxwell (980 and after)
No one needs to agree but it's not hard to grasp what I was hypothetically talking about.