Biggest waste of celluloid ever?

For me it would have to be:-

Highlander II: The Quickening, almost passed out with rage in the cinema.

Titanic, utter rubbish, hated it from start to finish.
 
The exorcist 2 and a really shoddy 80's b-movie shock'em dead. the only film I have ever walked out of the cinema on was Jackie brown but I think that was more to do with my ex girlfriend's inability to understand anything that is happening in real life or fiction for that matter.
 
ChroniC said:
Maybe i should have written to lion gate to stop making films instead. I cant believe thats actually possible :eek:
Click to expand...

How can they make a sequel to a film in which the only characters all died?? All two of them!

:confused:
 
vonhelmet said:
I really want to see it. I can imagine it's Marmite to be honest.
Click to expand...

I can see why people would like it but for it was just sooo slow that it just bored me to tears, the only thing it had going for it was the fact it was shot in black and white and kind of gave it a nostaglic feeling but otherwise for me it was rubbish.

Also im no fan of billy bob thornton he's wooden at the best of times and this performance was just shocking really
 
Psypher5 said:
Borrat.

Nearly walked out the cinema.

Waste of 8quid.
Click to expand...


Your either over the hill, or have had a funandectomy.
Its not possible for me even grasp how anyone could think that wasnt hilarious. :confused: :confused: :confused:

Omg your nearly 20. ohhhh :eek:
 
Id have to say Crash (the recent one). Awful script, awful acting just one big fake show from start to finish. Avoid like the plague.
 
nero120 said:
Id have to say Crash (the recent one). Awful script, awful acting just one big fake show from start to finish. Avoid like the plague.
Click to expand...

Best Motion Picture of the Year
WINNER
Crash (2004/I): Paul Haggis, Cathy Schulman

Best Writing, Screenplay Written Directly for the Screen
WINNER
Crash (2004/I): Paul Haggis, Robert Moresco

Best Achievement in Editing
WINNER
Crash (2004/I): Hughes Winborne
:rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
ChroniC said:
Best Motion Picture of the Year
WINNER
Crash (2004/I): Paul Haggis, Cathy Schulman

Best Writing, Screenplay Written Directly for the Screen
WINNER
Crash (2004/I): Paul Haggis, Robert Moresco

Best Achievement in Editing
WINNER
Crash (2004/I): Hughes Winborne
:rolleyes:
Click to expand...

oh oh, that means it MUST be good! Mustn't question the academy, no precious...

Edit: just saw this, lol:

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0375679/board/nest/39344234
 
I personally thought Crash was a very good film. I tried reading that thread, but there was a certain member (Morbid666 I think) who was trolling and I got bored.
 
I was very wary of seeing Crash after it won all the awards, but i was pleasantly surprised. I thought it was an excellent film. I loved the whole 'feel' of it.

As someone mentioned Alexander, it made me think of Troy. I dont know if i've posted that in here yet, but my god that was bad. I guess when it comes to films i'm somewhat of an optimist; i can always find the good in a bad film. So very rarely do i sit there and think ''this is dire''. With Troy i was a broken spirit. :(
 
ChroniC said:
If the academy was one person i wouldnt think your reply was redundant and ill informed, but seeing as 5,816 professionals vote on it, i will. I think thats fair, or would you like to vote.
Click to expand...

Surely you have proved that the academy awards are a barometer for quality films and anyone who disagrees is "redundant and ill informed". :rolleyes:

This guy put it best:

This movie tries to be the Bible of ethnic relations, but all it does is string together a series of incredibly unlikely events. Most of the characters are too one-dimensional to be considered real for event a moment. The dialogue is uninspired and boring. The only reason anyone finds it compelling is the subject matter.
Click to expand...

:p
 
This movie tries to be the Bible of ethnic relations, but all it does is string together a series of incredibly unlikely events.
Click to expand...

Because other films dont do that? Let's face it, most films are a series of unlikely events.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom