I agree with this, there were signs of genuine shock from the opposition benches yesterday as he was speaking.
Harriet Harridian looked almost broken when she took to the stand to give the opposition response.
I thought she reasoned quite well all things considered.
£1600 a year worse off that's working 16 hours, married with one child.
Bye bye car.
Work more.
Work more.
£1600 a year worse off that's working 16 hours, married with one child.
Bye bye car.

Ouch, I'm not going to be popular raising the fees this much![]()
I will have to let the dust settle and let my accountant give me the figures. A quick back of a fag packet calculation, I reckon on being about £5k down, which isn't so bad if I up my rate to mitigate some of that and plough more into my pension. Overall its a bit meh, not overly bothered.
[TW]Fox;28286918 said:The increase in the personal allowance is reducing the amount of tax you pay.
[TW]Fox;28288419 said:Surely the fees are set by market demand not the cost base. If your market could bear higher costs you'd already charge them?
) if we went on market forces we could charge a lot more than we do now (£35 a day for a full 10 hr day), as there is not enough childcare sufficency in the area, with only a few providers, and everyone has waiting lists.Work more.
Work more hours

Whoopee ****ing do. For most Public Sector workers who haven't had a pay rise in years (or at best have had 1%) another four years of being limited to 1% is a large pay cut.
Typical entitled Brit attitude - you don't see these eastern European workers complaining, no they'll just take what they're offered and get on with the job they're grateful to have in the first place. Perfect workers.
My sarcasm detector is twitching...I think it might be overloaded?