• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Can a 7950 Overclocked offer near 680 performance for less money.

Reading reviews, an overclocked 7950 can be about 10% faster than a 7970, which will make it about the same a 680. Ultimately the 680 will be faster (both overclocked) but the difference probably won't be worth the ~£80 saving.
 
Reading reviews, an overclocked 7950 can be about 10% faster than a 7970, which will make it about the same a 680. Ultimately the 680 will be faster (both overclocked) but the difference probably won't be worth the ~£80 saving.

I'd hope it's a bit more than that.
Scaling with the 79XX OC'ing is quite good, a 40% OC equates to quite a boost.

At a 40% OC, the 7950 is faster than the GTX680.
 
A 40% OC on a 7950 is 1125MHZ, from a stock of 800MHZ.
;)
I never mentioned anything about OC'ing a a 7970, other than the scaling is good.

lol I just took the top card from OcUK and see it was 900. I didn't look at anymore (too lazy me). As I said, I wasn't disagreeing with you just asking.

As you put 79XX, I took it as both.
 
Looking at the Heaven 3.0 benches, my OCed 7950's are in spitting distance of OCed SLI 680's so I would say yes, they can get close.

But only when OCed will a 7950 get close, and not all 7950's oc the same. My second card I can only get around 1070 on, and no amount of volts will get it higher.

First card I can easily get up to 1150 on.
 
There's a few factors, 28nm is said by just about everyone to simply cost a lot more per wafer than 40nm.

65/55nm to 40nm and you had basically an increase in wafer cost from $3.5/4k only to $5k so pricing wasn't disimilar(because wafer costs came down over time anyway) so you have essentially double the transistors per core for the same cost.

This gen it seems to be not far off double the transistors, but noticeably more expensive wafers making the improvement in cost(rather than performance/power) not anywhere near as good.

Also people are saying the cost in simply taping out a product is going up, process costs are increasing gen on gen. We're getting pretty good actual process improvements still, so the 7870 power usage is awesome, but the cost to produce between process generations is going up too fast now.

Some real competition between foundries would probably help there, if GloFo get their **** together then two companies competing for orders means lower costs, likewise if GloFo had 28nm gpu's being churned out today, it would effective hugely increase overal worldwide 28nm production capacity meaning between two companies demand for 28nm would decrease, and stock of cards would increase all which would help push prices down.

Lastly, people are simply accepting that its fine for people to raise gpu pricing, some price increase is unavoidable, £450 IS a joke, £500 is a joke, if people simply did not pay it...... prices would drop.

There's a price they can't go below and that's higher than last gen, then there is the price they can get away with because people are just paying whatever is asked of them. Consumers are to blame for the latter one of those, if people just refused to buy at those prices we'd all be better off.

i'm not sure about that, the dual cpu cards are sold for their bragging rites only, it's simply to say ``we have the fastest card`` as such the prices stay high...... a bit like a Rolls Royce, one just has to accept this.

the mid range high performance cards...... yes you're right :cool:
 
pricing is always an absolute joke on these sorts of cards. the problem is though, people pay it and that is why nothing ever changes. can't believe there are some who use things like dual 6990 and what not, what is the justification for doing so, because for gaming there is no point unless you are gaming at an insane high resolution. hell me 4870X2 is still handling most things without too much trouble and its three generations old, its like an antique.

so for a question, what do you crossfire 7950, 6990 users actually do that warrants so much graphics horsepower, same applies to the 580 switching to 680 bunch, what is the purpose of switching when most of the time the difference will probably be not obvious the majority of the time? too put it into perspective I want to get rid of my 4870X2 because it doesn't support Direct X 11, it consumes tons of power, gets rather hot and sounds like a leaf blower, which I would like to think is a reasonable point for changing. also its not like an 'attack' or anything, just an honest question?
 
2560x1440, 3D, and I like using anti-aliasing :D

Plus, I want to attempt to keep them for years... which will be a challenge as I think the longest I have ever kept a GPU was 18 months :D
 
Apart from the clocks that can indeed easily be increased to 7970 stock levels (925/1375), one should also take into consideration the noise increase. The load noise is considerably higher with 1000/1375 and voltage increase compared to stock...
I have a Sapphire 7950
 
i'm not sure about that, the dual cpu cards are sold for their bragging rites only, it's simply to say ``we have the fastest card`` as such the prices stay high...... a bit like a Rolls Royce, one just has to accept this.

the mid range high performance cards...... yes you're right :cool:

Do you understand the logistics of putting two GPUs on one card Mal?

It means double everything. Double the GPUs, double the transistors, double the coolers double the connectors.

That is why they cost what they do. It's not possible to just throw two GPU cores on one card and use the same parts and prices that you used on a single card.

Not only that but they do not sell en mass. This means that you have to bring in a designer to design and create the PCB and all the other bespoke stuff (like the two slightly smaller cooler blocks) and the shroud and so on. Then you need to commission a company to actually manufacture them which comes at a cost.

Now obviously if I were to go to a company that manufacture heat sinks for example (vapour chambers) then costs would be dramatically lower if I were to ask for 50,000 and not 10,000 as an example.

Like everything in life that you can buy the price is easily understood when you understand just what goes into R&D, manufacturing run costs and so on.

This is why cards like the Asus Ares and MARS II cost what they do. Why? because every single last part on them apart from the memory (even though it's double that of a normal card) and the GPU itself are completely ground up customs. They only make 1000 which means they don't get a bargain by going mass production, and all of those costs are passed onto you.

It's kind of like buying a standard Range Rover. It costs a set price. However, taking it to some one like West Coast Customs and asking them to make it completely unique will come at a cost.

Dual GPU cards are not cheap to make. They are not cheap to design, and they don't sell in mass numbers. Because of that you pay the price for them.
 
Apart from the clocks that can indeed easily be increased to 7970 stock levels (925/1375), one should also take into consideration the noise increase. The load noise is considerably higher with 1000/1375 and voltage increase compared to stock...
I have a Sapphire 7950

can a custom fan profile in trixx sovle that though, my unlocked sapphire 6950 runs hot even when standard but I worked out a custom fan profile to sort out my 950 1400 overclock. I agree noise is def a factor as long as its tolerable.
 
Hi just wondering that with the 7950 being priced around 80-/+ quid cheaper to a 680. If you were to overclock the 7950 to around
1150 core 1600memory, how far behind would it be to a gtx680 in a wide selection of games at 1920x1080.

All i've found so far is guru3d did some tests with an oc 7950 and their gtx680 review they overclocked the 680.

gtx680 (core1264 boost 1264 6634 memory)
7950 tfIII ( core1167 6256 memory)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
crysis 2 (1920 x1080)
gtx 680 70 fps
7950 72 fps

Alien Vs pred
gtx 680 60 fps
7950 tfIII 58 fps




Are there some cheaper 7950's that dont have voltage control? Like powercolor didnt allow their cheaper 6850s to.

If same clocks, 2-5% difference same as the 7970.
so, overclocking the 7950 is a price/performance king.:)
 
Back
Top Bottom