Permabanned
- Joined
- 10 Dec 2008
- Posts
- 4,080
- Location
- London
Reading a story about some celeb who is getting divorced after 7 weeks claiming the standard 'default' excuse.. 'irreconcielable differences'.
Couple of questions. In the UK, during divorce proceedings, if one member of the partnership actually thinks the relationship's got a chance ..
1) Do you get wierd situations where just one of the couple is seriously arguing AGAINST the divorce be granted. As in 'That argument never happened', 'I bought her flowers every day' or 'He still deep-down loves me I think, and gave me this necklace last week and told 'witness A' he still loves me just yesterday' (!!), along with 'I still think we have a massive chance of working' etc.? So the judge has to choose whether the relationship is really screwed or not?
2) Is it POSSIBLE for the judge to say to the person filing the divorce words to the effect 'The other person hasn't done anything too bad. You've had some arguments but get over it. Permission to divorce denied - I do not think you are suffering from 'irreconciliable differences' - both go and give it another go and try harder??
3) If BOTH people want a divorce, can the judge STILL say 'This is ridiculous, this whole thing is based on an argument about what name to give to the cat? And you've only had one 15 minute argument .. Divorce refused!' or is this not an option for the judge?
Basically are divorce courts always about who gets the family dog .. or can there be serious discussion about whether a divorce is going to be even awarded - despite 1 or even both members of the 'union' wanting it ....? All the ones I see on TV just seem to be about the assets .. is this always the case?
Couple of questions. In the UK, during divorce proceedings, if one member of the partnership actually thinks the relationship's got a chance ..
1) Do you get wierd situations where just one of the couple is seriously arguing AGAINST the divorce be granted. As in 'That argument never happened', 'I bought her flowers every day' or 'He still deep-down loves me I think, and gave me this necklace last week and told 'witness A' he still loves me just yesterday' (!!), along with 'I still think we have a massive chance of working' etc.? So the judge has to choose whether the relationship is really screwed or not?
2) Is it POSSIBLE for the judge to say to the person filing the divorce words to the effect 'The other person hasn't done anything too bad. You've had some arguments but get over it. Permission to divorce denied - I do not think you are suffering from 'irreconciliable differences' - both go and give it another go and try harder??
3) If BOTH people want a divorce, can the judge STILL say 'This is ridiculous, this whole thing is based on an argument about what name to give to the cat? And you've only had one 15 minute argument .. Divorce refused!' or is this not an option for the judge?
Basically are divorce courts always about who gets the family dog .. or can there be serious discussion about whether a divorce is going to be even awarded - despite 1 or even both members of the 'union' wanting it ....? All the ones I see on TV just seem to be about the assets .. is this always the case?