I would LOVE for Gibbo to do 2gb v 4gb test at all resolutions to finally put this debate to restbut how about the OcUK test between GTX560 1gb, and 2gb versions. Can't find the link, but IIRC the 2gb had the edge.

Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
I would LOVE for Gibbo to do 2gb v 4gb test at all resolutions to finally put this debate to restbut how about the OcUK test between GTX560 1gb, and 2gb versions. Can't find the link, but IIRC the 2gb had the edge.

The cards are around the same performance level. If vram had any impact, the 670 wouldn't have that lead over the 7950.
What bit of different architecture/clocks/8xMSAA didn't you get?What bit of different architecture/clocks/8xMSAA didn't you get?
@PCmonkey, vram doesn't matter a jot in the games tested, they never use anywhere near 1GB, so the test was a complete waste of time, higher clocks won on the day, there was plenty of screens in the thread below that shows the vram impact on the same gpu with 1v 2GB.
@oggiet, OcUK done that, and a huge 'debate' ensued:
http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showthread.php?t=18344284
It depends if you want to spend an extra £100 to allow you to notch up the MSAA in game by one setting. E.g. @ 1440p going from 2x or 4x to 4x or 8x.
By the time games require more than 2gb of vram to run games at high settings (this does exclude things like aa, but at 1440p who cares?) the 670 will not have the raw power to provide pleasing framerates anyway. And then your extra £100 would be wasted.

what has architecture and clocks got to do with vram limit?
the game was tested using 'very high settings' not sure which AA that implies though

Max payne uses 2.7GB at 1440p, you really need to stop giving advice if you dont have first hand experience.
So OP 4gb would be better, except Nvidia are way overpriced and therefore not worth it. For an extra 2GB they're charging an extra £50-100, only fools would consider it!
I use 2 460's. no problem maxing any games out at the resolution you are wanting to play, don't waste money if theres no need for it. And i play in 3d
What about sli, would 670 2gb cards be a good choice. I'm looking to go sli and wondering if to go 670 or 680 ?
I use 2 460's. no problem maxing any games out at the resolution you are wanting to play, don't waste money if theres no need for it. And i play in 3d
then why does the 2gb 670 perform much better than the 3gb 7950 at 2560x1600
http://www.hardocp.com/images/articles/1339406167huP5qqtm9S_2_5.gif
Also if you look here, at 2560x1600 even the 1gb/1.25gb/1.5gb cards are peforming as they should
http://www.techspot.com/review/537-max-payne-3-performance/page5.html
what has architecture and clocks got to do with vram limit? :S the game was tested using 'very high settings' not sure which AA that implies though
That is simply to do with grunt I'd say. I doubt the 7950 is OC'd and the 670 will do it itself

dynamic clocks != factory overclock![]()