![[TW]Fox](/data/man-of-honor/2009.png){kind=avatar}
I found the Clio more chuckable and more nimble than the CTR. Build quality? No idea about reliability but both cars rattled more than mothercare and had an interior which felt like it was thrown together in somebodies lunch hour.
Civic Type-R (EP3) service history
- Thread starter mr tommo
- Start date
I found the Clio more chuckable and more nimble than the CTR. Build quality? No idea about reliability but both cars rattled more than mothercare and had an interior which felt like it was thrown together in somebodies lunch hour.
Permabanned
- Joined
- 13 Nov 2006
- Posts
- 5,798
I'll take a pic of my red CTR on a good angle, with black tyre shine on to convince you 
CTR over a Clio any day. The clio's interior is horrid.
CTR over a Clio any day. The clio's interior is horrid.
Was the CTR you tried a prefacelift?
I like quick french cars, but id definatly take another CTR over a 172 or 182. The 182 looks crap as well.
My CTR didn't rattle at all, the interior was fine, and no complaints, thought the stock radio/CD player is a bit cuffy. Far better inside than a 172, can't comment on 182.
I like quick french cars, but id definatly take another CTR over a 172 or 182. The 182 looks crap as well.
My CTR didn't rattle at all, the interior was fine, and no complaints, thought the stock radio/CD player is a bit cuffy. Far better inside than a 172, can't comment on 182.
...and you take a risk with a 182 (cup - not driven a std), and find it's more fun to drive in certain situations. Pure personal choice between those two. I ended up plumping for a CTR a few years back, but subsequent blasts in a 182 Cup pretty much revealed why they are highly regarded from a purely driving aspect.
