• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Con Lake Con firmed [Warning: AdoredTV]

I'm saying that no one should buy some **** box medion PC and expect it to perform in the same league as one from a better oem just because they both headline with the same CPU...

The problems not Intel CPU's here but a rubbish oem computers...

Or course Intel are engaged in some marketing BS with lots of talk of 'up to' performance figures and hiding the potential shortcomings of all core boost speeds...

Story is the old Latin phrase.... Caveat emptor
You say its rubbish but that is not strictly true. It runs the CPU as intel intended. It is able to meet the base clock and i'm assuming the single core boost clock. That is all intel state that the CPU needs to do. It is probably able to run it at those clocks all day long without issue. Just because it doesn't run the CPU out of specification (a.k.a overclocks the CPU) doesn't mean its rubbish.
 
What's average though? Stock intel cooler? The 8400 holds 3.8 on a friends z370 a pro which is a lower end board and stock intel cooler.

Can't bench individual prebuilts till they are out.

I bet it will sit all day long at circa 3.7 to maybe 3.9 but those figures will be well short of the scores that some (a lot) of the reviewers are showing.

And its not all that easy to find reviews of off the shelf computers always either.
 
The 8400 likely meets 65w more easily than the 8700 which has hyperthreading. I'd expect less throttling if any.

The K chips are almost not important as everyone runs them out of spec.
 
You say its rubbish but that is not strictly true. It runs the CPU as intel intended.

It runs the CPU within to the bare minimum of the expected standards...

One of the reasons I don't particular rate Ryzen as highly as others currently is because the CPU's have so little OC potential above stock compared to Intel.

Sure you cam take a premium Intel CPU and surround it with the barest minimum quality wise of componentsit will run bit this is rather missing the point.

And medion PC's ARE rubbish... End of
 
Last edited:
I also like to see other peoples views of his videos. You may not realize how well he is regarded.

I also tend to believe his judgment rather than some ill informed poster.

Of course people will believe what they want to believe. And, I believe this guy is a charlatan.
Just looking at the titles of some of his videos are enough ;

The i5 is Dead...Long Live the i5?
Nvidia - Getting Away With (GPU) Murder
The Great Coffee Lake Con Job
History of Nvidia GeForce, Part 2 - The Way You Were Meant To Be Played






 
Of course people will believe what they want to believe. And, I believe this guy is a charlatan.
Just looking at the titles of some of his videos are enough ;

The i5 is Dead...Long Live the i5?
Nvidia - Getting Away With (GPU) Murder
The Great Coffee Lake Con Job
History of Nvidia GeForce, Part 2 - The Way You Were Meant To Be Played


Sorry, I didn't quite catch that. Can you use a larger font. :)




 
Well then people should see if they can find a review of the actual product they are buying. If they can't then perhaps that is something that needs to be looked into (more reviews of actual oem products), but that is not really Intel's fault, or anything to do with anything being a "con".

You can see though that this leaves a glaring disconnect between the shiny numbers in the tech press and the typical retail PCs that the average person has pushed at them. Sure truth in marketing has always been abused, but this TDP-spec/benchmarks gap hasn't been a thing until recently.

True, having benchmarks available of the actual products most people buy is a must as most buy laptops where the chassis makes a massive difference to actual achievable performance. The tech press has to focus more on this than the unrepresentative top 5% of performance.
 
It runs the CPU within to the bare minimum of the expected standards...

One of the reasons I don't particular rate Ryzen as highly as others currently is because the CPU's have so little OC potential above stock compared to Intel.

Sure you cam take a premium Intel CPU and surround it with the barest minimum quality wise of componentsit will run bit this is rather missing the point.

And medion PC's ARE rubbish... End of

You still don't get it. Parts have little to do with this. It is all about the TDP. Yes you can improve parts but unless you tell the chip to run above Intel advertised TDP it will throttle.
 
Probably true though... Certainly quickened intel release schedule but they would released a hex core consumer CPU around now anyway as they would/ were rapidly running out of ways to offer an even slightly compelling upgrade of their own products never mind AMD's
Didn't stop them before. I think people have incredibly short memories if they think Ryzen only had a small impact on the CPU industry.
 
You still don't get it. Parts have little to do with this. It is all about the TDP. Yes you can improve parts but unless you tell the chip to run above Intel advertised TDP it will throttle.

Intel have always rated their parts quite conservatively if you run them at stock and '100% in spec'...

Adored doesn't get watched by average Joe public. He's whinning on his channel to people who would never buy this sort of stuff.

He's an AMD zealot proved time and time again with a complete lack of objectivity
 
It runs the CPU within to the bare minimum of the expected standards...

One of the reasons I don't particular rate Ryzen as highly as others currently is because the CPU's have so little OC potential above stock compared to Intel.

Sure you cam take a premium Intel CPU and surround it with the barest minimum quality wise of componentsit will run bit this is rather missing the point.

And medion PC's ARE rubbish... End of
So an OEM should overclock the CPU and therefore void the Intel warranty?
Whats the point in overbuilding/overspeccing a PC? Or did you forget that they need to make profit with each sale.
 
So an OEM should overclock the CPU and therefore void the Intel warranty?
Whats the point in overbuilding/overspeccing a PC? Or did you forget that they need to make profit with each sale.

Pretty sure ocuk manage to sell stock rated Intel based computers that boost to the levels seen in reviews and still make a profit but then ocuk are not a completely **** provider of PC's to consumers
 
I don't think you know what "zealot" means. But even if he was that doesn't discredit the information brought up in this video.

'A person who is fanatical and uncompromising in pursuit of their ideals'

His ideals are that AMD is the saviour to save us from the evil intel and nvidia whilst ignoring the rubbish AMD has on occasions churned out and the sometimes dodgy treatment it's consumers have faced
 
It runs the CPU within to the bare minimum of the expected standards...

One of the reasons I don't particular rate Ryzen as highly as others currently is because the CPU's have so little OC potential above stock compared to Intel.

Sure you cam take a premium Intel CPU and surround it with the barest minimum quality wise of componentsit will run bit this is rather missing the point.

And medion PC's ARE rubbish... End of

Sure with Ryzen there isn't as much overclocking headroom as Intel, but as you say the target customers typically know what this is and chooses AMD/Intel accordingly. We all try to factor in expected performance in our buying decisions.

So you might agree that it's a shame if Joe public sees the shiny i7 logo and expects the i7 8700 performance that's published everywhere only to find that it's falling rather short - but it's all to spec and neither CPU nor system integrator will accept fault.
 
Intel have always rated their parts quite conservatively if you run them at stock and '100% in spec'...

Adored doesn't get watched by average Joe public. He's whinning on his channel to people who would never buy this sort of stuff.

He's an AMD zealot proved time and time again with a complete lack of objectivity

All major OEMs run things at stock.

He has also revealed even if you wanted to, 100 seconds may be the maximum period it can run above TDP (non-K chips that is).
 
Folk wont like his videos because he piddles on there fav company for dodgy practices. As intel and nvidia are... well lets say a bit dirtier than clean its not hard to dig up stuff on them.
AMD are more incompetent than bent, although they have had there moments too.
 
What's particularly comical is the implied message in this thread that a reviewer looking at a CPU (not a complete PC) should artificially hold it back by testing it with low quality hardware because this makes the competition look better!

If you want to go buy some low end medion style pc go look at a review of that PC or try a better OEM
 
Back
Top Bottom