People forget that the type of car will have a hugh impact on the way the tyres work. On a Mini the tyres might be epic, on a 7 series they might be pap. Same with which wheels are driven etc etc. THIS is why Evo tyre tests like any such test should be taken as a snapshot in time and a feel not a fact for all cars in all situations. Those Goodyears you all rave about were crap, utter and total crap on my RS4. Since putting PZero's back on it brings it home to me. Soft, inaccurate and generally understeery when pushed. The PZero's are much hard in the ride but they feel tighter but I do recall the Goodyears took longer to come in, over a thousand miles but I also suspect that was also a bit of placebo effect as I became more use to them.

It also speaks volumes when you see BMW, Porsche, Ferrari etc. generally using only Bridgestone and Michelin.
To be fair I've just been outside for a walk and I discovered that the road is indeed very slippery underfoot, like I said, greasy as hell. Due to this I think I'll give the CS3s a couple more weeks before judgement. However my feelings on the softness of the tyre still stand - much nicer to drive, much more controllable but less raw and the turn in is less crisp.

[TW]Fox;18393889 said:A lot of that is as much about volume sales deals as anything else - and it's not as if Continental don't have a share of the OEM market, pretty much every Audi comes out of the factory on CS3's these days..
)I've been using CS3's on all my cars for years. I buy them for the misses too as I feel they're much safer in the wet.Well, i thought i better drag this thread up again to give my opinion of the CS3's now that they are fully worn in.
They are fantastic.

Well, i thought i better drag this thread up again to give my opinion of the CS3's now that they are fully worn in.
They are fantastic.
I never thought i would be saying this and at one point i called Continental because i was afraid that i had counterfeit tyres and i was looking to try and return them and get something else put on the car - but boy am i glad i didn't.
About a week after i posted my original thread i started noticing how much they had improved. This was when they had had about 750 miles put on them. The amount of grip they give is simply staggering and nothing seems to catch them out. If you haven't turned in enough going into a bend, you can just tighten your line with no drama and not worry about the car throwing a hissy fit (which the RE050A's used to do) - i think this is mostly down to the slightly softer sidewalls, but it makes the tyre so much useable on the average road. Even in the soaking wet they just don't seem to ever lose grip. All that stuff about the traction control light coming on when i accelerated hard in second, and the ABS kicking in way to early has disappeared, which leads me to think that at 500 miles, the tyres still weren't fully worn in.
And i also thought my opinion of the turn in, compared to the RE050A's, wouldn't change either, but i don't know if i'm just getting used to it or if this has improved too? Either way, i don't care, because, and i say this with a touch of caution, the car feels better than it ever has before. There is none of that fidgtyness, crashiness or bump steer you get with the RE050A's, but there is still all the grip there.
Given the option, i would definitely buy these tyres again as they have turned the car into what i imagine it felt like the day it rolled out of the showroom.
For anyone reading this who has recently bought Conti SC 3's and hasn't found them great - give it time. Also, check, double check and triple check tyre pressures.
They are very, very good. Tweaking the pressures a bit made a big difference with me as well.Ok I've snapped.
Why is an Evo called an 'EVO'?
Ok I've snapped.
Why is an Evo called an 'EVO'?
Yeah which is fine, I just dont understand the capitals.
The only EVO i know is the magazine![]()
Ok I've snapped.
Why is an Evo called an 'EVO'?

Because its loud and capitals = shouting![]()