So performance is pretty much tapped out and a non-issue.
For example I have installed a 4-bay hotswap Icydock cage in my new build. The idea being going forward I will simply replace large capacity storage HDDs for lower grade SSDs in the future.
If job is data storage you don't want to touch QLCs, except maybe with blunt instrument, untill they've been beta tested for many years.
They're pretty much analog storage and need to distinguish between ridiculous 16 charge states to avoid error.
Planar TLC already run into serious issues in data retention in Samsung 840 EVO.
Which needed bubblegum/duct tape "fix" with firmware frequently rewriting data to prevent it from evaporating.
And TLC needs to distinguish just 8 charge levels/states having more tolerance for degradation.
And haven't seen any non-synthetic measurements proving NVMe as really much faster for say OS loading.
Drives in this list are fifity-fifty NVMe and SATA-signaled:
https://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/Crucial/MX500_M.2_1_TB/8.html
Continuous copying of big amounts of data back and forth is in home use really only thing where NVMe's speeds would show.
Would be simply extremely hard to be limited by IOPS of SATA SSDs.