Sounds reasonable to me. if she paid tax, it would go to the united nations. Who pay her salary.
Anyone got a good reason why paying her 200k & taxing at 50% would make more sense than paying her 100k and taxing at 0%?
edit^ I'd apply the same reasoning to British civil servants.
Anyone got a good reason why paying her 200k & taxing at 50% would make more sense than paying her 100k and taxing at 0%?
edit^ I'd apply the same reasoning to British civil servants.
Last edited:
