If you use XP as the eligible product to install a Vista upgrade, then you can't use that XP anyway, since in license terms that XP license + Vista upgrade are now a single Vista license (over simplified for this case).
This is exactly what I thought I discovered when I researched Vista. I wanted the option to dual boot and the info I read categoricly stated that if you install the upgrade version of Vista, you cannot dual boot as it invalidates your XP license as it installs. Then Kojack comes and says it is possible, though apparently dodgy in license terms. I was just after some confirmation of what was legal.
It's like if I had Photoshop CS2 and bought the CS3 upgrade - I can't use both products. I can either use CS3 or choose to uninstall the upgrade and go back to CS2.
Yes this would appear to be sensible, its just that with the transition from Win98 to XP, I bought the upgrade version of XP and was freely allowed to dual boot with Win98 if I wanted, so it was reasonable to assume the same would happen with XP->Vista upgrade. Like I said, I did the research, found this was not allowed anymore, then subsequently found someone had done it and became confused again, hence me asking for a definitive comment in here. I think I'll go back to my base position that if I want to dual boot Vista I'll buy the full retail version and be done with it.