As chronic said my viewpoint varies on this as you have some people taking their employer to tribunal over some of the most pathetic things you can imagine and then you have those who have genuine cases but can't afford to end up out of pocket.
Then reduce the amount of the fee. It costs businesses millions fighting these spurious claims.
Probably somewhat akin to fraudulent car insurance claims, toe rags will try and claim all sorts.
The success rate of claimants didn't change significantly after the fee was brought in. The fee was clearly discouraging rightful claimants as much as bogus claimants.
This is a great victory for justice in this country.
Then reduce the amount of the fee. It costs businesses millions fighting these spurious claims.
Probably somewhat akin to fraudulent car insurance claims, toe rags will try and claim all sorts.
You normally have to jump through a few hoops before you end up at a tribunal hearing and if a claim is baseless then it should presumably get kicked out without the need for a company to spend a lot of money.
I think this is a good thing:
Thats the problem, those hoops are easy to fudge or a very low bar.
No they aren't - vexatious claims very rarely get to court due to robust pre-hearing mechanisms and if they do, it's usually due the company not engaging with the process (i.e. burying their head in the sand hoping it will go away).
Simple way to avoid this. Employers should treat their employees with respect and fairlyThen reduce the amount of the fee. It costs businesses millions fighting these spurious claims.
Probably somewhat akin to fraudulent car insurance claims, toe rags will try and claim all sorts.
Simple way to avoid this. Employers should treat their employees with respect and fairly
End thread