Soldato
I think the local smart meters do store data for a while in case of gaps in sending info, so should find it backfills OK.
@Trig You realise the smart meter is the meter itself right? That IHD doesn't do anything to send data.
I didn't, i thought it communicated with the meters and then connected to the wifi in the house and then sent the info out to their system..
Everydays a school day eh..
thought they locally kept the data for a year, if the octopus app data is not up to date that can be an issue with them getting it from the DCC smet2I think the local smart meters do store data for a while in case of gaps in sending info, so should find it backfills OK.
Maybe prices will go down later next year can't see factories will wind down production many businesses will fold and a deep recession we will all be on the dole
Cheers tory voters
Makes you wonder how everyone could afford energy in 2001 when usage was at its peak. God knows what 100w incandescent bulbs would cost now!
My assumption is something just went wonky at Octopus over the weekend since both (G&E) hadn't updated, anyway gas has now so suspect a data backlog and/or they just hadn't realised
I was just reading an article on the BBC and it was mentioning fuel poverty and like many of these things it doesn't make sense.
We both earn good money but I would suggest that we could easily be lumped into fuel poverty by their standards.
We heat the room/rooms we are in to ~19 degrees and the rest of the house is set to not go below 14. Our house is thermally crap. If we heated it to the point of comfort throughout we would be looking at a £20+/day gas bill. Maybe more. No one would suggest we are in fuel poverty with a straight face.
They seem to have gone too extreme the other way, doing it based on flat % was wrong fair enough, because if you on say a 100k salary and you spending 30% of it on energy, you still have a lot of money left for everything else, whilst 30% of a 15k income its a very different story. But the new methodology seems designed to just make things look better politically.They changed the definition and due to the current version I agree many who can for sure afford it will be classified as in fuel poverty
They seem to have gone too extreme the other way, doing it based on flat % was wrong fair enough, because if you on say a 100k salary and you spending 30% of it on energy, you still have a lot of money left for everything else, whilst 30% of a 15k income its a very different story. But the new methodology seems designed to just make things look better politically.
They seem to have gone too extreme the other way, doing it based on flat % was wrong fair enough, because if you on say a 100k salary and you spending 30% of it on energy, you still have a lot of money left for everything else, whilst 30% of a 15k income its a very different story. But the new methodology seems designed to just make things look better politically.
Agreed, to a "healthy temperature" maybe, which I think is considered 18C, but not comfortable, and everyone has a different comfort level as well.My point was that the definition of "heat your home to a comfortable level" is a silly metric. To heat my home to 20 degree throughout so I was comfortable would cost me an absolute fortune. I would never do that even though I can afford to. Not being able to afford to do that wouldn't mean I was in fuel poverty.
I'm still waiting for my weekend's gas usage in the Octopus app. In the Hugo app all the data is there so the meter has definitely been reporting correctly.My assumption is something just went wonky at Octopus over the weekend since both (G&E) hadn't updated, anyway gas has now so suspect a data backlog and/or they just hadn't realised
Everyone lube up for this weeks cold weather.
Laughs in Scotland where its routinely been lower than 5'C for weeks now.Yeah, seems like it's finally getting wintery now. I wonder how wide spread not turning on heating because you can't afford it will be over the winter.