Soldato
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukn...-foreign-criminals-we-dont-try-to-deport.html
What a laughable situation.
So, due to continued/past mistakes we should let all criminals stay going forward?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukn...-foreign-criminals-we-dont-try-to-deport.html
What a laughable situation.
So, due to continued/past mistakes we should let all criminals stay going forward?
And there we go, the first person to go on the ignore list.
But disciplinary action for a 2010 fight with a colleague means he is considered to have a criminal record.
If they are the rules then that is that.
So, due to continued/past mistakes we should let all criminals stay going forward?
No, it should be reviewed per-case. Deporting somebody because they had a fight two years ago, is not as justifiable as deporting somebody because of a string of undesirable behaviour.
Given his 13 years service history, they should overlook this minor thing.
I think the fact he has a wife and two kids here is a tad more important!
I'd say they're equally important in this particular situation
Possibly if his service was honorable, sadly it wasn't, as far as we know he could have half beaten someone to death? On the other hand it could have been a minor incident?
Lack of details of the severity and circumstances of the punch-up means I personally can't make a judgement either way tbh.