There is no debate around does it exist as they all suffer from it no matter what the American interlooper (i'm being polite) tried to suggest. His argument was around loss of power, he tried to infer that the engine was not showing full power due to being run in 3rd gear and I showed this to be **** as I ran mine in both 3rd and 4th on the last rolling road day I attended and it made zero difference to the numbers. He may be correct about transmission losses and correct calculations, he can't prove it of course but I am always dubious of Rolling Roads, but that never stops an American with a 'fry' on his shoulder. The fact remains all std RS4's seem to be well below the stated BHP when put onto a rolling road and Audi dealers will acknowledge the issue as will well known independents, one of who is providing a work around oil bypass catch tank thingy.
Here's RS4 valves in the UK with only 3700 miles on the engine. The owner used Shell Optimax and V-power fuel, along with Castrol Edge, after purchasing the car with 1200 miles on the odometer:
And here is a different car showing how it goes:
The point I am not clear on is if this issue is causing the power loss, do all RR'd have the wrong calculations for flywheel power or is Audi making a car that fails the trade description act. Getting an answer to this is not something I have looked into too much really, I got bored (I tend to do that) and as mine has been running fine and is plenty quick enough I don't really have the time of inclination to find the truth.
Interesting to hear they are going up in value, seems to be the case from what I hav seen on PH too. It is, for all my light hearted bickering a truly epic road car, better all round by some way than either a C Class AMG or M3 IMHO. May not tick the cool boxes with many (splendid) and may not look as agressive to some, but as a mile munching all road all weather 4 door car I am not sure anything bests it.