Film Recommendation

Associate
Joined
10 Dec 2003
Posts
1,094
I'll be getting a lomo LC-A for my birthday in a couple of weeks ("What? You want a camera that deliberately takes bad pictures??" - The Missus [philistine :rolleyes: ]). I've got some Vevlia 100 to try some cross processing but would like any recommendation for some nice warm C41 film. I seem to remember Kodak film being a touch on the warm side? Or should I just stick with Superia?

Cheers,

Mohain
 
For film, i stick to

Fuji Reala 100
Fuji NPH 4000
Fuji NPZ 800

slides

Fuji Velvia 50 or 100
Fuji Astia (you get that magazine portraits look)
 
Cheers dude - don't really understand different processing methods ~ yet :eek:

I'm probably going to get ISO 200 stuff ~ should that make a difference?

edit : Jees their site is hard to navigate, but I found this which says to process for E-6 :)
 
Last edited:
To clear a few things up,

E-6 process is slide film, which results in a positive result
C-41 process is negative film, which gives, wait for it, a negative.

Slide film is harder to use than negative film, as if your metering is more than about half a stop off you will be dissapointed with the results, whereas with negative film, even if you're 5 stops over exposed you can still get nice looking prints, however, a well exposed slide is well worth the effort.

Raymond reccomended some of the pro fuji negative films, however NP H/S/C/Z no longer exist, and have been replaced with Pro 160S, Pro 160C, Pro 400H, and Pro 800Z. Reala, is still the same old Reala 100 however. These are all great films, especially the Reala, and Pro 160S for portraiture and wedding work, as they are low saturation, accurate film emulsions. Pro 160C is more saturated, and more contrasty and are great for landscape work.

For slides I generally use Velvia 50 (though it's been discontinued) which is great for landscape work as it's *very* saturated, and has been refered to by some as DisneyChrome, it is however pretty bad for portrait work, as it doesn't produce nice skin tones. Velvia 100 is a very similar emusion, with a few subtle differences, and Velvia 100f is another different emulsion which isn't as saturated as Velvia 50/100, but still more so than Astia/Provia.

Astia is a benchmark portraiture film, it provides very accurate skin tones, and colour reproduction, and isn't very saturated at all. If you want a photo to look as the scene did when it was taken then Astia is your film.

Provia is a mix between the two, more saturated than Astia, and less saturated than Velvia. I like this film.

Sensia is a consumer slide film by Fuji, whereas the others are 'pro' films, and is pretty much Provia but with less carefull storage.

Fuji's Superia range of films (100/200/400/800/1600) are consumer colour negative films, which are good for all purpose shooting, and still yield excellent results, very good grain characteristics, nice and sharp etc. I've made a 15" * 10" enlargement from a cropped area of a Superia 400 negative, and still can't notice any grain.

I don't really know much about Kodak films, but their portra nc/vc films are good for portraiture and weddings (both 160asa), with the nc being neutral colours, and vc being vivid. The gold series is Kodak's classic consumer print film, and is fairly saturated, and can yield bright, punchy colours, but many think it's a little over the top.

In terms of slides, Kodak make a wide variety of emulsions, Kodachrome 64/200 are both very sharp and provide good natural skin tones.

Kodak Elitechrome comes in a variety of offerings, Extra colour is their answer to Velvia, saturated and bright colours, whereas the standard Elitechrome is fairly accurate, and good for portraiture, and accurate scene reproduction.

In general slide films will give less grain for a given film speed than negative film, but with the quality of current negative films this is a bit of a moot point.

There is then black and white film to consider, which I would thoroughly reccomend processing yourself as it's easy and gives much more control, but if you can't then stick to chromogenic (B&W films with a regular C-41 process) film, such as Ilford XP-2 super. For home processing any of the Ilford films are fantastic, with the Delta range being exceptionally sharp and low grained, and FP4+, HP5+, and Pan F+ being 'classic' b&w emulsions.

The films I use regularly are Fuji Pro 160c, pro 400h and reala, Provia 100f, and Velvia 100, for B&W I stick to Ilford, and use Delta 3200, Pan f+, and HP5+, these I process in either Ilfosol-s, rodinal, or microphen.

For a lomo I'd stay away from slide film, as the metering will not be accurate enough, you may get a good shot, but you would probably have to bracket to make sure you got at least one decent exposure.

Colin.
 
Dfhaii said:
For a lomo I'd stay away from slide film, as the metering will not be accurate enough, you may get a good shot, but you would probably have to bracket to make sure you got at least one decent exposure.

Do you still get a large lateral range if you process slide film in C41 and make prints?
 
To be honest with you I'm not sure, I know however that people reccomend overexposing by about 2 stops when cross processing. Probably the best place to ask that is the Film & Processing forum over at www.photo.net

I wouldn't have thought that the dynamic range of the film would increase due to cross processing though.

Colin.
 
Thanks Dfhaii. I also read that you should overexpose by 2 stops when cross processing but when I asked at the mini-lab up the road he said to expose normally (when processing E6 in C41) :confused: I tried it the other way, cross processed C41 film in E6, over exposed by 2 stops, and they all came out ... over exposed ;)

I guess I can only try and see what happens :)
 
For general shots i get Reala 100, i dont see any reasons to get 200 iso films at all. If its bright, use 100, if you are indoors or low light get 400. 200 is just asking for grain without any benefits.



great post there by Dfhaii, very informatived. I still have some velvia 50 and NP/H/Z in the freezer, got them before they were discontinued, i used to get them in bulk from that place in jersey.
 
Yup, same place for me RaymondLin. When you run out of the NP*, the Pro's are very very similar emulsions, hard to tell a difference between the two really.
 
I'm off in half an hour to try out the films I got for my newly acquired film body (Canon 1000Fn). They are Fuji Superia 400, Kodak 100 TMax, Ilford Delta 100, Ilford PanF Plus 50 and some Velvia 100 slide film. I will post my impressions on the results when I get them developed :)

PS: might be a while, I have to buy a scanner or get access to one.
 
Back
Top Bottom