Caporegime
- Joined
- 7 Apr 2008
- Posts
- 25,223
- Location
- Lorville - Hurston
O LOL! so i have done the right approach then?
Cool so its not toooo obvious? i used a bounce card btw and aimed m flash at the ceiling
Skin tones show reflections and specular highlights giving that plasticy look, flash is caught in the eyes, some of the shadows are not very soft, the main light source would naturally be the door behind but this is being over powered.
O LOL! so i have done the right approach then?
So if i tone down the power of my flash, that would have helped on this image?
What I've dabbled with in the past, is using manual mode to expose for ambient and get the shutter speed I want. Then use flash compensation to balance things out.
So if i tone down the power of my flash, that would have helped on this image?
Thats how i do it mate. shoot in manual when my flash is on. 1/60 is my shutter speed and usualy f2.8 wide open as my apparture
I think Rojin means is to take meter readings off the background/ambient and set a manual exposure that will properly expose the back ground, then find the expose that will properly expose the subject. The flash should then be set to balance out that difference.
When done well this technique can give very good effects.
Yes exactly. I could never quite dial out the shadow under the chin though... I need to get reflective floors or something![]()
I don't want to criticize, sound condescending or rude but I think you could improve the above photos a lot with better compositions. E.g., with the children they are very small in the frame with lots of background distractions, and in general children look better if you got down at the same level as them. Ashallow DoF may help reduce the background.
Similar in the second set, (on topic, there is a shadow on the wall behind the older boy that looks like it comes from the flash....), the bookshelf to the left is very distracting and you have cut off the older boys arm just to include the background which I don't think works here. You have to be careful cropping through a persons joints, e.g. cropping between joints is typically fine but if you cut someones arm off at the elbow/knee/wrist or in this case fingers leads to an odd look. This is a psychological phenomenon.
Feel free to disregard these comments, I'm no expert on portraiture.
I don't want to criticize, sound condescending or rude but I think you could improve the above photos a lot with better compositions. E.g., with the children they are very small in the frame with lots of background distractions, and in general children look better if you got down at the same level as them. Ashallow DoF may help reduce the background.
Similar in the second set, (on topic, there is a shadow on the wall behind the older boy that looks like it comes from the flash....), the bookshelf to the left is very distracting and you have cut off the older boys arm just to include the background which I don't think works here. You have to be careful cropping through a persons joints, e.g. cropping between joints is typically fine but if you cut someones arm off at the elbow/knee/wrist or in this case fingers leads to an odd look. This is a psychological phenomenon.
Feel free to disregard these comments, I'm no expert on portraiture.
Some pictures can only be done with flash so I don't agree with this. I've just entered the strobist world so I'm going to enjoy learning using off-camera flash. I want to master that. And then when I master natural light, I will be a god.Basically, if you can tell a flash was used then I don't like the photo.