So basically games are decided by refs agendas, awesome.
Hes a massive **** but I think I agree with what he was saying up to a point. He managed to make it sound like he went into the game to try and influence the result but I think what he is saying is something different.
Basically he had 2 options as the game went on.
1. Send off a load of Tottenham players for their tackles
2. Let Tottenham get away with more than they should but as a result they will lose their heads and potentially the game.
Option 1 results in everyone claiming he ruined the game and cost tottenham the league
Option 2 results in everyone talking about the game and the fact that tottenham lost their heads
He words it badly but I understand his motives.