Gary Glitter at it again .......

Soldato
Joined
22 Jul 2012
Posts
15,291
Location
London
While he may well have been at it again, this is to do with cases that happened over 30 years ago.

/GD Pedant mode disengaged

Ed: Snap. Oh well :(
 

4T5

4T5

Man of Honour
Joined
30 Aug 2004
Posts
27,739
Location
Middle of England
The charges relate to two women who were aged between 12 and 14 at the time of the alleged offences between 1977 and 1980.

Helps if you read the article before creating a Thread title. :p
 
Soldato
Joined
13 Aug 2010
Posts
3,067
Alright alright I get it ......

Is there any evidence a paedophile once caught (or serves time) stops being a paedophile ?
 

4T5

4T5

Man of Honour
Joined
30 Aug 2004
Posts
27,739
Location
Middle of England
Alright alright I get it ......

Is there any evidence a paedophile once caught (or serves time) stops being a paedophile ?

Chemical castration is reported to work quite effectively. That's what the Doctor said on that prog about Broadmoor.
 
Soldato
Joined
13 Aug 2010
Posts
3,067
Chemical castration is reported to work quite effectively. That's what the Doctor said on that prog about Broadmoor.

that will only stop them from acting upon their urges but paedophilia is an attraction to young children
 
Caporegime
Joined
17 Feb 2006
Posts
28,680
Location
Cornwall
So he's been found guilty of attempted rape of several girls, aged between 10 and 13, from 1975 to 1980.

Now, nobody is going to want to defend Glitter. He's got form for this kind of thing.

But how can there be any evidence of these crimes 40 years after the event? I don't understand how a guilty verdict can be returned.
 
Top