I wouldn't say being "ultra-feminist" is light-years ahead of anyone.
Gay men murdered by being pushed off cliffs in Australia
- Thread starter Mr Badger
- Start date
I wouldn't say being "ultra-feminist" is light-years ahead of anyone.
Why are the men who committed these murders so concerned with where another man puts his piece 
I will never understand homophobia and I grew up in a time where some outer family members and friends would openly ridicule gay people. No surprise those same people are all low-lives with nothing going for them.
I will never understand homophobia and I grew up in a time where some outer family members and friends would openly ridicule gay people. No surprise those same people are all low-lives with nothing going for them.
Soldato
- Joined
- 1 Jul 2007
- Posts
- 5,392
I have a large extended family in Australia (most I've never met) and a large majority of them seem to be really xenophobic and have some rather strong view points and prejudices. Which is quite worryingly since their parents, or grandparents were part of the ten pound pom immigration lot.
Soldato
- Joined
- 11 Sep 2013
- Posts
- 12,513
Given how our lot handle their feminism like neanderthals, the Aussie girls put ours to shame. People exhibiting behaviour from 30 years ago as Vincent suggested would be utterly torn to pieces and put solidly in their place.
Noticed this article on the same page OP posted - https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-australia-52612957
Sickening.
Sickening.
Man of Honour
- Joined
- 29 Mar 2003
- Posts
- 57,397
- Location
- Stoke on Trent
Just finished the 4 part series.
Soldato
- Joined
- 30 Sep 2005
- Posts
- 16,736
Why are the men who committed these murders so concerned with where another man puts his piece
If anything they are doing them a favour by increasing the women to men ratio. They should be pleased not pushing them off cliffs.
I’ve often wondered if the gay haters might be gay themselves and just too scared to admit it.
You are right though. Getting annoyed about where a man puts his willy is very odd. Personally I don’t think about other mens willys but hey ho.
I don't think if you asked them why they hated gay people they could give any sort of logical answer.
I was going to say the same thing, and the fact "light-years" was used as if were a measurement of time annoyed me.
I was going to say the same thing, and the fact "light-years" was used as if were a measurement of time annoyed me.
Soldato
- Joined
- 21 Oct 2011
- Posts
- 22,398
- Location
- ST4
Why are the men who committed these murders so concerned with where another man puts his piece
Hmnn, playing devils advocate here...
Are you really saying that you wouldn't be concerned about a Man putting his piece inside a 12 year old (Boy or Girl) ??
Before you say "Oh but that's illegal"
a) It is illegal till somebody decriminalises it. Would "You" (And I mean collectively, not asking anybody in particular) be suddenly OK with the idea simply because parliament passed a law that allowed it? (Something that various Gay Rights campaigners are indeed campaigning for, Tatchell has campaigned for a reduction to 14 certainly )
b) A quick google suggests that Homosexuality wasnt fully decriminalised in Oz until the late 90's (And even then it was a close run thing with only one vote in it), indeed, the death penelty was still on the books as a potential sentence in Victoria up untill 1949!. Because of Oz'z federal nature, diferent states had diferent timelines but it is likely that the pushers in Sydney during the 80's would have regarded their victims the same way many people regard nonces today.
It seems likely to me that the Police at the time might have done so also. "We are better off without them lads, don't look too hard"
Now I am certainly not advocating or justifying throwing gays off a cliff (Or paedophiles either) but I can understand the context of both the act and why the police at the time might have looked the other way.
Soldato
- Joined
- 11 Sep 2013
- Posts
- 12,513
Your annoyance comes from the assumption that both Brit and Aus fems are progressing at the same rate and thus that progress would be measured by time to begin with... I do know light years are a measure of distance. I can use miles instead if you prefer, or are you a Remainer who'd rather I used Eüro-kilometrés?
Saying that, it actually works both ways. The distance travelled by unimpeded light in a year can be used as a measure of distance. I understand particle physicists do this sort of thing fairly often, albeit more with light seconds. But in terms of things like four dimensional space, time itself is another direction... which is time and which is spatial depends on the perspective of the observer, no? It's all Relative...
But yeah, Aus Fems have it down to a fine art. Our lot are merely thugs with thrush.
Nope, they're good to go.
Where in the country did you visit?
Soldato
- Joined
- 11 Sep 2013
- Posts
- 12,513
Yep, along with all those bipolar people. Autistics too. Add on the schizophrenics, OCDers and anyone else who is mentally ill. Society shouldn't have to carry anyone with a mental illness, just make it a crime and throw them. Yeah.
Good call, G-Man....
I don't wish to have the list expanded. Just the paedophiles will do.
People seem to think it is 'Britain in the sun'. Ha!
Soldato
- Joined
- 30 Sep 2005
- Posts
- 16,736
Well funnily enough I actually won it in a competition a few years ago (well, many years ago). I only stayed in the sydney area, so perhaps my view is quite a narrow one. Maybe I should have said everyone who lives in sydney are *********
Soldato
- Joined
- 11 Sep 2013
- Posts
- 12,513
You mean you don't believe they are mentally ill?
Soldato
- Joined
- 11 Sep 2013
- Posts
- 12,513
I'd say more of a preference or fetish, like brunettes or MILFs, but debatably it is, yes. Biologically finding young people attractive is not necessarily an illness in itself, as suggested by the age at which girls become able to conceive. Plenty of studies suggesting that, along with the whole Japanese schoolgirl thing which I think is just weird. However, societal responsibilities require that the age of consent be one at which a person is usually deemed sufficiently competent to fully comprehend the implications of, and to care for any children that result from, such activities. That is primarily what makes underage intercourse illegal, and presumably why it varies around the world.
Attraction to those far too young to even conceive, though, is highly questionable, and arguably indicative of mental illness. That said, there are support groups for paedos, who acknowledge their questionable desires but refrain from acting upon them and seek to help others deal with their struggles. The argument is that it's not illegal or immoral to simply have thoughts about something...
However, actually acting on those desires, particularly with full knowledge that it is legally and morally wrong, as well as biologically wrong, and knowing how society will treat you as a result, is most definitely a mental illness.
But we still don't throw drug addicts off a cliff, nor the schizos who shout at cheese in the supermarket, so why the paedos? In both cases they're sick and need treatment.
Legality, as mentioned earlier, only applies so long as it is deemed illegal... which in this case it is, but mostly due to the societal damage that results from their activity, which is why some mentally ill people are still allowed to roam free.
We still lock up those who are psychotic killers and such, rather than simply throwing them off a cliff, so why the inconsistency here?
Dunno. It could be. Research is still ongoing, right?
I'd like to argue not, given that it happens with most other creatures in nature, but I'm not a fully qualified psychologist.