Geeza Missing for 5 Yrs....

Soldato
Joined
14 Oct 2007
Posts
2,738
I take it you have all heard about this. Any thoughts?

If your faking your death, you DON'T have a picture taken with your wife while your suppose to be dead.

According to the news, she has to pay ALL that life insurance money back.

Thoughts??
 
It was probably a case of thought he was dead, claimed, then he turned out to be alive, but they were just too greedy to give it back, got caught and are now being demonised. Not that they arent in the wrong, but Im sure they arent master fraud criminals like the news is making out.

Got to love the british media and the way they put stories accross.
 
Owned?? I saw something about this on the news thismoring but it didnt make any sense as i wasnt watching when the story started

Basically, a guy went missing 5 years ago and was pronounced dead as his body wasn't found when his canoe washed up on shore. last week he handed himself in to the police station and said he couldn't remember where he had been. Then his wife owned up to knowing he wasnt dead last year when she moved to Panama.

So i've read and heard...
 
Basically, a guy went missing 5 years ago and was pronounced dead as his body wasn't found when his canoe washed up on shore. last week he handed himself in to the police station and said he couldn't remember where he had been. Then his wife owned up to knowing he wasnt dead last year when she moved to Panama.

So i've read and heard...

...and the fact they have a picture of them together last year. :)
 
Its guite amusing that after pictures of the bloke were see by the Police, he handed himself in and tried to say he could not remeber where he had been for the last five years. Perhaps he is Harold Bishop?
 
It was probably a case of thought he was dead, claimed, then he turned out to be alive, but they were just too greedy to give it back, got caught and are now being demonised. Not that they arent in the wrong, but Im sure they arent master fraud criminals like the news is making out.

Got to love the british media and the way they put stories accross.

ah, but by the sounds of things, the son's didn't know he was alive, so sounds like it's not just a case of "well, we've spent the money, so we'll keep it quiet..."
 
ah, but by the sounds of things, the son's didn't know he was alive, so sounds like it's not just a case of "well, we've spent the money, so we'll keep it quiet..."

how did you come to that conclusion? just because they didnt tell there sons, doesnt mean anything, remember, the key to a secret is tell as little people as possible/no one.
 
how did you come to that conclusion? just because they didnt tell there sons, doesnt mean anything, remember, the key to a secret is tell as little people as possible/no one.

Including their own flesh and blood, if so, then they have just won bad parenting of the year 2007.
 
how did you come to that conclusion? just because they didnt tell there sons, doesnt mean anything, remember, the key to a secret is tell as little people as possible/no one.

What I mean is that they claimed on his life insurance. Then she was with him last year. Which means she obviously knows that he was still alive. Yet the son's (or so it would appear) had no idea he was back from the dead, as it were.

Which makes it sound to me like it's an deliberate attempt at insurance fraud. I mean, secret or not, you'd still tell your own son's that their father isn't really dead...
 
Back
Top Bottom