Soldato
- Joined
- 23 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 13,597
And why should they have to cut back on pensioners? Some of the poorest people in this country are pensioners and considering the vast majority have contributed to the country throughout their life time, they should be looked after.
I wonder how many people on this forum would agree with the OAP's I give computer lessons to. Their argument is that they have paid in for 50 years and now they should get a return but the 16-25's have not paid in/enough and should get nothing.
Considering there is a finite pot of money, the money, through the budget (obviously dependant on what party is in power) gets pushed around to the benefit of the poor, the old, the wealthy etc. Everyone gets a piece of the pie, you just have to wait your turn. Its just not possible to cater for everyone at the same time which is why the budget always benefits one group one year and another group another year.
There is a lot of truth there in the way the UK does politics. Why is it beyond them not to cater for everyone but at a reduced level rather than jam today but nothing for another five years?