• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

GFX for CUDA in here now!

I've used CUDA for rendering in 3D studio, and it's interesting, but not faster than the CPU, and that was a GTX480 vs an i7 920 @3.8. Sony vegas may be a better use.

The Sony vegas benchmarks show a good speed improvement over an 17 960 at stock, but that's with a GTX570.

I wouldn't imagine a 440 would be quicker than the CPU in that build, even before it's overclocked.

I'd be intersted to see how it performed, but I wouldn't expect much. Of course if the engine supports rendering on both the CPU and GPU in parallel, (Which 3D studio doesn't) it can only help.

Taken from your other thread. The answer is the same, wherever you ask.
 
This might be of interest to you Sony Vegas 11 first benchmark . He uses a GTS 450 for benchmark and from his conclusion:

" Although the speedups that Sony claims on their website are pretty awesome, for someone with less budget and thus a smaller GPU, the results are less impressive. "
 
Back
Top Bottom