Global Warming - Eliminating all U.S. gasoline powered vehicles would reduce...

Soldato
Joined
15 Nov 2003
Posts
14,401
Location
Marlow
"Eliminating all U.S. gasoline powered vehicles would reduce worldwide carbon dioxide emissions by 0.18%."

Is this statement true?

If so, then surely at least as regards cars and the like (which we're getting taxed on now to stop using) it's a lot of fuss about nothing isn't it?
 
"Eliminating all U.S. gasoline powered vehicles would reduce worldwide carbon dioxide emissions by 0.18%."

Is this statement true?

If so, then surely at least as regards cars and the like (which we're getting taxed on now to stop using) it's a lot of fuss about nothing isn't it?

Source?
 
That is most porbably true. But may depend on context.

For starters most CO2 in the atmosphere is there naturally, humans just contribute slightly. (But this doesn't mean a slight increase in human made CO2 wont cause disproportionately large effects.) so Co2 by US cars might be 0.18% of the total, but could be more like 1% of man made CO2.

And you have to put this into the context of oil/coal/gas power stations across the world, all the worldf cars, gas heaters, factories, ships, planes, industries, industrial processes that release co2.
 
Last edited:
"Eliminating all U.S. gasoline powered vehicles would reduce worldwide carbon dioxide emissions by 0.18%."

Is this statement true?

Might be. Does sound slightly low, but I bet the figure isn't anything like the Guardian reading, sandal wearing, vegetarian, Prius driving hippy brigade would have us believe.
 
"Eliminating all U.S. gasoline powered vehicles would reduce worldwide carbon dioxide emissions by 0.18%."

Is this statement true?

If so, then surely at least as regards cars and the like (which we're getting taxed on now to stop using) it's a lot of fuss about nothing isn't it?
Does sound rather low to be honest.
Indeed, would like to know myself.
 
Well, the GW crowd effectively claim an increase of 0.00004% makes a disproportionate difference compared to the other 0.00034% of atmospheric CO2...:rolleyes:

0.18% of that is even more microscopic...
 
I heard the IT industry will soon produce more CO2 than the aviation industry.

It was on a program on the BBC, might have been Click, when they were talking about the server farms for Google.
 
Last edited:
Anyone else fed up with all this C02 nonsense? Just seems an easy excuse to tax motorists. I bet in 1000 years people will look back and laugh.
 
Surely one of the biggest causes of greenhouse gases is a century of chopping down the rainforests and urbanising everywhere? trees and plants convert CO2 to Oxygen don't they?

It's becoming pretty evident that Global Warming has been changed to Climate Change due to lack of warming, probably getting ready to tax us for breathing and fine us for farting.
 
The only good thing about this recession is how the newspapers are covered with how we are all going to end up in soup kitchens, rather than burnt/drowned to death because of our C02 emmissions.
 
Hamburgers are the Hummers of food, when it comes to global warming.

If cows are driven to extinction and all humans switch to grazing, all will be well.
 
"Eliminating all U.S. gasoline powered vehicles would reduce worldwide carbon dioxide emissions by 0.18%."

Is this statement true?

It could be. Automobile emissions make up about 20% of man made emissions (IIRC), the US produces 22% of world emissions; so that's roughly 4.5% of all man made emissions.

Man made emissions contribute roughly 5% of all emissions so that gives a figure of about 0.2% of all CO2 emissions coming from US gasoline powered vehicles which about lines up with your figure, and mine is very back-of-an-envelope.

If so, then surely at least as regards cars and the like (which we're getting taxed on now to stop using) it's a lot of fuss about nothing isn't it?

No, this doesn't follow at all. Looking at it as a % of total CO2 emissions is utterly misleading. The 150 billion tonnes or so of carbon kicked out by natural environment was in equilibrium with the 150 billion tonnes or so absorbed by the natural environment; the 7 billion or so tonnes a year extra we're adding are not in equilibrium (roughly 3 billion tonnes of it get absorbed by increased plant growth; leaving about 4 billion extra in the atmosphere each year).

The upshot of this is that in 1850, atmospheric carbon dioxide was about 280 parts per million, and today it is about 385ppm. So that little 5% extra we're emitting each year has increased atmospheric carbon dioxide by over a third; and it will keep on going up.

That matters because CO2 absorbs infrared radiation, and so traps solar energy that would otherwise be radiated out to space. It's not a big effect, but it doesn't need to be; our atmosphere results in our planet being about 50 degrees hotter than it would be without it. If increases in CO2 raise the amount of energy absorbed by just 4% that's a 2 degree rise in average global temperatures - which may not sound a lot but it will have drastic effects in terms of agriculture in large parts of the world and sea level rises, as well as the spread of diseases and the already fragile ecosystems that we rely on. CO2 alone won't produce this rise; in fact water vapour contributes more to the greenhouse effect than CO2 but a side effect of temperature increases from CO2 levels will be a raise in water vapour compounding the temperature increase.

Going back to the cars for a moment; dealing with cars, even eliminating them, won't solve the problem. We should be looking much more at domestic, and commercial, emissions. I rather suspect we're not because it's politically a lot more tricky to tackle than just battering on us car users.

Finally, one other thing your figure illustrates is that no one country, even a giant like the US, can tackle the problem alone.

(Note: the figures I've given are mostly off the top of my head and roughly ball park figures; I don't vouch for their precision but they're close enough to be meaningful)
 
Last edited:
I don't know about overall pollution, but China is certainly the world's largest CO2 polluter.

And speaking of climate change...

5cljjb.png
 
Back
Top Bottom