Good News Girls: Cervical cancer vaccine available

Zip

Zip

Soldato
Joined
26 Jun 2005
Posts
20,224
Location
Australia
This article is a lot about giving it to girls at skool but it has some infomation that might interest you aswell :)
Girls may get cervical cancer vaccine at school

SCHOOLS may be used to deliver the Australian-designed world-first cervical cancer vaccine to girls aged 11 and 12, under proposals being considered by federal health experts.

The inventor of the technology used to create the vaccine, Australian of the Year Ian Frazer, immunised the first women with the vaccine at launches in Sydney and Brisbane yesterday. The launches mean that the vaccine, which is sold under the brand-name Gardasil, can now be purchased from pharmacies - as long as patients have a GP's prescription and are prepared to pay the estimated $460 total cost of the three doses required over six months.

The vaccine is 100 per cent effective in preventing infection with four strains of the human papillomavirus, two of which are responsible for up to 80 per cent of the cervical cancer cases in Australia. But Gardasil's Australian maker, the Melbourne-based drug company CSL, is confident it can demonstrate to the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee, which advises the federal Government on medicine subsidies, that providing Gardasil free of charge to specific groups would be cost-effective.

However, after the age of 26 there is less point in having the vaccine, as most women would already have encountered most of the strains by then.

Women will also still need to have pap smears, because Gardasil only protects against two of the 15 or so HPV strains associated with cancer.

Under the plans, due to be considered at the advisory committee's next meeting in November, the primary group targeted for vaccination would be girls aged 11 and 12. As the virus is spread during sex, girls should ideally be immunised before they have become sexually active.

Under CSL's application to the committee, there would also be a catch-up vaccination program for girls aged 13 to 17. A third group - women aged 18 to 26 - would also be able to get the vaccine free of charge through their GPs.

If approved, the earliest that a schools-based immunisation program could start would be February 2008. Professor Frazer said yesterday he was excited to see his invention brought to the market.

The first woman to receive the vaccine yesterday, 24-year-old Kate Willetts, said she was eager to step forward after treatment four years ago to remove pre-cancerous cells detected during a pap smear. "It wasn't a good thing to go through - I wasn't expecting to get an abnormal pap smear at 20," she said.

http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,20867,20286469-2702,00.html
 
Guess you learn something new every day: didn't know any kind of cancer could be immunised against - thought they're all mutations occuring within the cells.
 
Yeah same, but this can be nothing but good I suppose.. Until our bodies become immune to the vaccine.
 
manveruppd said:
Guess you learn something new every day: didn't know any kind of cancer could be immunised against - thought they're all mutations occuring within the cells.

I didnt think they had anything like this either until i saw it on the news all over the place today.

Apparently it prevents you from getting the 4 main Human Papilloma viruses(Herpes i think or could be genital warts) and with them stopped they wont be causing Cervical cancer anymore, there will be some other ways of getting it but not as many because the main cause is the Human Papilloma virus
 
manveruppd said:
Guess you learn something new every day: didn't know any kind of cancer could be immunised against - thought they're all mutations occuring within the cells.

They are but with this cancer mutations are caused by viruses.

naffa said:
Yeah same, but this can be nothing but good I suppose.. Until our bodies become immune to the vaccine.

A vaccine is a weaker form of a virus. You don't become resistant to a vaccine, if you were you would be immune to the virus.
 
Last edited:
if a mans wife/long term sexual partner dies of cervical cancer (or mets etc etc) and he remarries or starts a new long term sexual relationship - his second partner has a higher than average chance of also developing cervical cancer
that fact boggled my mind for a while :confused:
 
goldilocks said:
if a mans wife/long term sexual partner dies of cervical cancer (or mets etc etc) and he remarries or starts a new long term sexual relationship - his second partner has a higher than average chance of also developing cervical cancer
that fact boggled my mind for a while :confused:

Its because he wopuld have more then likely caught the Human Papilloma Virus off her and given it to his second wife
 
yeah that's right - because the HPV virus is one of the main known causes of cervical cancer. Men of infected women will be carriers although they won't have any effects themselves, other than passing it onto their partners.

It's something like 90% of people who go on to develop cervical cancer have a particular strain of HPV, but that doesn't mean that 90% of HPV carriers will go on to develop cervical cancer (because there are many strains, they don't all cause it).

If you can vaccinate against the virus, then you can't contract it. Hence the cervical cancer cases would be virtually eradicated. Won't do much good for girls who are sexually experienced now, but will be for the future generations.

As long as they don't all go out and contract HIV instead.
 
Last edited:
kitten_caboodle said:
yeah that's right - because the HPV virus is one of the main known causes of cervical cancer. Men of infected women will be carriers although they won't have any effects themselves, other than passing it onto their partners.

yeah, theres a huge article on it in one oncology text book (my degree is oncolgy based) i understand the science behind it (HPV etc) but the concept of a 'contagious cancer' was something that up until that point was alien to me

the possibility of vaccinating against any 'killer disease' is a fantastic thing imo
it's just a shame it'll take so many years to get any results from the study
 
Last edited:
goldilocks said:
yeah, theres a huge article on it in one oncology text book (my degree is oncolgy based) i understand stand the science behind it (HPV etc) but the concept of a 'contagious cancer' was something that up until that point was alien to me

the possibility of vaccinating against any 'killer disease' is a fantastic thing imo
it's just a shame it'll take so many years to get any results from the study

What do you mean study? :confused:
Its all ready avaivlable to the public if thats what you mean?
 
Energize said:
A vaccine is a weaker form of a virus. You don't become resistant to a vaccine, if you were you would be immune to the virus.
A vaccine a dead virus isn't it? Or maybe it would be either.. Either way I've realised I'm wrong.. :rolleyes: You'd become immune to antibiotics. Not a vaccine. Excuse my stupidity.
 
naffa said:
A vaccine a dead virus isn't it? Or maybe it would be either.. Either way I've realised I'm wrong.. :rolleyes: You'd become immune to antibiotics. Not a vaccine. Excuse my stupidity.

Yeah dead or weaker. Its the bacteria that become immune to the antibiotics not our bodies though. ;)
 
Back
Top Bottom