It's the principle that counts though - "We'll put a hole in the lifeboat unless we get what we want" is how the unions come across.Big mountains out of rather tiny molehills......
It's the principle that counts though - "We'll put a hole in the lifeboat unless we get what we want" is how the unions come across.Big mountains out of rather tiny molehills......
It's the principle that counts though - "We'll put a hole in the lifeboat unless we get what we want" is how the unions come across.
That is what happens when employers (in this case The Govt) refuse to listen to their employees concerns and in some cases actively create division and consternation.
It's the principle that counts though - "We'll put a hole in the lifeboat unless we get what we want" is how the unions come across.
Yup - chain a mans wrist to a wall and light a fire under his feet and he'll chew his own arm off.
Bit of an extreme comparison but I'm sure you know what I mean.
If only 1 in 5 PCS members strike then there won't be any problem will there? But the vast majority will strike because they support the action.
Same could be said for the financial sector and this countries economy. Both lots a bunch of self-serving ******s once you get high enough up the chains of command.
Serwotka is making a wonderful case to the public for significant restrictions on the right to strike and the trade union movement...
The solution to protected, legalised blackmailing is to remove the unwarranted protections.

Well not quite, no. The bank bailouts were done not because the banks were threatening to do harm if they didn't - the banks had already done the harm, trousered the cash and were shrugging their shoulders.
Very aptly put I like that! However, I was referring more to the desire they go back to a more Clintonesque structure. (not the card shop the cigar dude)Wont happen - at least not in the short time the coalition have left in governance![]()

Are you confusing support with the union bullying machine and misplaced ideas of loyalty again?
Will you apply the same logic when the vast majority of the public support a smackdown of the unions?
If only 1 in 5 PCS members strike then there won't be any problem will there? But the vast majority will strike because they support the action.
For the vast majority of British people it's better to put up with one bad day due to industrial action during the Olympics than suffer weeks and months of disruption after the Olympics due to the government's mishandled cuts.

We can't let Labour back in yet, their mess isn't cleaned up enough to allow for their fiscal incompetence to come back![]()
[TW]Fox;22383608 said:Do these people really think that making the UK a laughing stock by going on strike during the Olympics will do ANYTHING to help growth in this country?
It seems they are all it - bus drivers, train drivers, border staff, you name it, lets threaten a strike in the middle of the UK's time on the world stage![]()

What Union bullying machine would that be Dolph. Does this go on in PCS?

Aren't you the one saying the we shouldn't listen to the public?
[TW]Fox;22383608 said:Do these people really think that making the UK a laughing stock by going on strike during the Olympics will do ANYTHING to help growth in this country?
It seems they are all it - bus drivers, train drivers, border staff, you name it, lets threaten a strike in the middle of the UK's time on the world stage![]()
If Ed buggers off and we see a "Hollande" style candidate arise I think it's a forgone conclusion.
I'd rather the unions made us a laughing stock than the private security company attempts to put profit over safety and be so consistently slack they'll get all the world's finest athletes blown up with a cheery allah akbar ...