• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

**GTX 690 NOW AVAILABLE AT OcUK!!**

Essentially they do.

SLI would have to be working perfectly to double the performance of a single GPU.

Quite often it doesn't work that well so you don't see double the performance.

That wasn't the point he was posting against in the first place though... unless I misinterpreted it.

Edit here it is:
What Surveyor said. I assume a single 680 clocks better as well. I think allot more people are running higher resolutions these days and with BF3 it's really required if you want to run 60FPS constant with AA and not FXAA.

Which is why I was saying that a single GPU card generally clocks better than their dual GPU elder brother.
 
That wasn't the point he was posting against in the first place though... unless I misinterpreted it.

He was responding to this:

Actually the 690 clocks twice a single 680. Though I have a feeling it gets diminishing returns.

It doesn't.

I took the first post to mean that the GTX 690 had twice the performance of a GTX 680.

It obviously doesn't "clock twice a single 680".

I was trying to say why it doesn't have twice the performance.
 
Last edited:
True but thats just because they lowered the base clock really isn't it?

There's a good reason that they're shipped with lower clocks than the single GPU equivalents ;).

Anyway, it's fairly common looking back historically that two single GPU cards overclock better than a dual GPU equivalent. That was my point.
 
There's a good reason that they're shipped with lower clocks than the single GPU equivalents ;).

Anyway, it's fairly common looking back historically that two single GPU cards overclock better than a dual GPU equivalent. That was my point.

Yeah I would guess that but... theres probably a "good" reason Intel ship their CPU's at 3.5Ghz when on stock volts they easily hit 4.3Ghz xD
 
Yeah I would guess that but... theres probably a "good" reason Intel ship their CPU's at 3.5Ghz when on stock volts they easily hit 4.3Ghz xD

If you believe that a 690 will overclock as high as two single 680's then fine, I'll let you believe that ;).

We're not talking huge differences but enough to point it out.
 
Why does SLI do better than a single card?

Single card with two GPU's is still SLI...

EDIT: Images below as you obviously still think you know better :p

As to why I believe it's because the GPU's aren't able to be clocked as high due to a shared power supply on a 690 (1 * 8pin + 8pin) for two GPU's compared to a dedicated power supply per GPU for each 680 card (1 * 6pin + 6pin).

Happy to be corrected on this if I'm wrong or it's more complicated :)
 
Last edited:
battlefield31920.png


battlefield32560.png


battlefield35760.png
 
I might buy one if it drops to £800, if I can get loads of old junk sold first. But I dont think I will get as much as I need for one of these.

... Maybe its time to sell a kidney :p
 
Last edited:
A year from now I doubt it will be much less than £600, the absolute minimum I can imagine it becoming by the end of 2013 is £450-£500
 
Wow I missed all the excitement. Thanks for the benchmarks above.

Now seriously, if anyone is thinking of selling their 680 for a 690, I'll happily buy the 680 off you!
 
Back
Top Bottom