His friend sounds like one if he's willing to throw a friendship away because OP watched a film. I'd usually just dismiss it as joking but leftists have been disowning people for having non-conformists beliefs for a while now. I'd be surprised if his friend is really a Trump supporting Brexiteer people on the right tend to be more tolerant of differences of viewpoint.
Help me settle a Michael Jackson debate with a friend
- Thread starter terley
- Start date
His friend sounds like one if he's willing to throw a friendship away because OP watched a film. I'd usually just dismiss it as joking but leftists have been disowning people for having non-conformists beliefs for a while now. I'd be surprised if his friend is really a Trump supporting Brexiteer people on the right tend to be more tolerant of differences of viewpoint.
He really is, he adores trump almost as much as Milo Yianoppolis does. He is borderline racist.
He sounds like a horrible person.
People that overly far in either direction tend to be horribly intolerant of differences of viewpoint.
People that overly far in either direction tend to be horribly intolerant of differences of viewpoint.
Caporegime
What a load of nonsense lol. Both right and left wingers are very intolerant of other people’s differing views.
Anyhow OP your ‘friend’ seems a bit tapped in the head. Don’t get me wrong I love MJ’s music, as a person not so much as he was definitely a strange one. Maybe that’s due to his upbringing which is the fault of his parents.
Soldato
Yes. Michael Jackson hardly accused himself of child molesting.
Soldato
I'd buy him the dvd for a present...
Caporegime
Permabanned
Jacko did prefer small white boys, not sure if that's racist, and if it is, whether I should be more outraged at that or his wanton pederasty.
Phew, this being a leftie loon snow flake is hard work
Phew, this being a leftie loon snow flake is hard work
Soldato
I think he was an opportunist and just abused whomever was presented to him. There was a news article about him abusing a girl just last weekend.*
*The news article was last weekend, not the abuse. He can't hurt children anymore as he's dead.
Have we really gone from, "I reckon MJ was a pedo" to "Anyone who doesn't think MJ is a pedo is probably a danger to children as well", in the space of 2 GD pages?
Impressive.
Have we really gone from, "I reckon MJ was a pedo" to "Anyone who doesn't think MJ is a pedo is probably a danger to children as well", in the space of 2 GD pages?
Impressive.
That is kind of how it works these days,
Scarey isn't it!
Man of Honour
Sums it up pretty much hah.
MJ's music is immense. I don't know the facts of his personal life but people should only follow the evidence available and not base their views around personal opinion. Those people are arses.
Lol, what kind of stereotype are you trying to paint?
Soldato
There comes a point, while listing the character flaws of one's friends, that you come to the realisation that you are even more of a tool for hanging round with them, or possibly for slating your mate on an internet forum. Dealers choice.
yeah this - its pretty clear cut what they found.
I that that at best he had a very odd obsession and probably should have been kept away from kids. Worst case he was a full on abuser.
There have been the police reports (granted some of them seemingly sexed up a little perhaps had some fake stuff added) showing the dodgy stuff, multiple accusations - some witnesses describing specifics re: his private areas accurately etc.. some people who denied being abused later retracting that and claiming they in fact were.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...ranch-police-records-leak-abuse-a7094876.html
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...tion-photos-featuring-naked-teenage-boys.html
So I mean if you were a really really dedicated Jackson fan then maybe you could say "OK he's a bit of a freak, had an unhealthy interest in young boys, had nudes of young boys and used to share his bed in young boys but the multiple young boys who said he abused them were lying, it is their word against his and the one that described his private parts accurately just got lucky"
I reckon, if I had to gamble either way, the guy is a ****ing nonce!
There have been the police reports (granted some of them seemingly sexed up a little perhaps had some fake stuff added) showing the dodgy stuff, multiple accusations - some witnesses describing specifics re: his private areas accurately etc.. some people who denied being abused later retracting that and claiming they in fact were.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...ranch-police-records-leak-abuse-a7094876.html
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...tion-photos-featuring-naked-teenage-boys.html
So I mean if you were a really really dedicated Jackson fan then maybe you could say "OK he's a bit of a freak, had an unhealthy interest in young boys, had nudes of young boys and used to share his bed in young boys but the multiple young boys who said he abused them were lying, it is their word against his and the one that described his private parts accurately just got lucky"
I reckon, if I had to gamble either way, the guy is a ****ing nonce!
Soldato
The hysterical intransigent asinine kind, of a low emotional intelligence quotient that is vicariously linked to leftist ideological aims rooted in a verdure of Marxist quixoticism.
But who am I to pronounce my argots of contemporaneous thought processes combined with the concatenations of the advancement of those aforementioned?
Soldato
- Joined
- 18 Oct 2012
- Posts
- 8,339
If he's so closed minded he not only refuses to acknowledge opinions contradicting his own but actively tries to prevent others from expanding their minds then he's not someone someone worthy of any time.