[TW]Fox;18024917 said:Is this 100% fact? Because if he genuinelly drove along with her on the bonnet, failing to stop, until suchtime as she fell off the bonnet, where he then ran into her, I can see absoluitely no way he wouldnt be charged for an offence relating to that.
The fact he wasn't charged with an offence relating to that makes me think much of it is media exageration, unless it was deemed that she was killed by the initial impact perhaps?
Don't get me wrong, I despise this guy and if news broke tommorrow that somebody had killed him I wouldnt shed a tear.
that what was her father said on the new report i watched on sky new website this evening.
he may well have exagerated, but at the end of the day he is still minus an only child.
he put his trust in our legal system and it has failed him in a truely undescribable way. i defintely would not be as reserved as him, i'd be out for blood.
