I recently went from E6600 GTX470 to QX9650 GTX 470 and felt my money spent on the GPU was for the most part wasted up to that point as the GTX was clearly getting nowhere near the support from the rest of the system to live to full potential.
I have now gone from QX9650 to i7 2600K and my minimum FPS has increased significantly yet again, I again think what a waste of money the 470 was until I had a CPU to let it breath free...
for example even with a QX9650 @ 3.6ghz Crysis was mostly CPU bottlenecked at 1920x1080 at least where minimum fps is concerned. Under Crysis bench I now get approx 30fps at 1920x1080 4xaa ultra high whereas previously I would get just about 30fps at 1368x720 no aa but ultra high. just from changing CPU? That must mean theres CPU bottleneck in there somewhere... dual to quad is a must if you ask me, and if you're going to do that - price/performance - Sandy Bridge all day long.
Interesting stuff, It's definitely time for an upgrade, Crysis runs like **** for me right now. I think this pretty much proves that the 'your money is always better spent on the GPU' argument isn't necessarily right.
http://www.anandtech.com/bench/Product/288?vs=100
i7 950 vs. SB i5 2500K - and that's before the overclocking begins!
If you compare like for like (i7 950 vs SB i7 2600K) the gap becomes even larger!
http://www.anandtech.com/bench/Product/287?vs=100
Cheers for that, really useful
