How long will it take to be able to cycle 50 miles a day

I'm honestly not trying to be rude, so please don't take this the wrong way. You clearly have no concept of how much bikes and ancillaries are if you think £500 is a lot. I paid more than £200 for my cycling shoes. Almost the same amount for my helmet. My latest wheels were more than £500 without tyres and tubes. You can spend more than £10,000 on a bike.

There's no reason why you can't do the trip, but you need to change your attitude and approach massively. Try and scrimp on the basics and I'll promise you'll suffer when things go wrong.

I've looked on eBay and this is the sort of thing you should be looking at. You will be able to buy some panniers and the rest of the stuff second hand as well.

If you haven't the money then get down your local pub/supermarket and ask for some shifts.

Are you trying to put cycling out the reach of everyone who dosen't want to pay a ridiculous sum of money? I've no doubt that your bike is probably way better than my bike could ever be, but I don't have any interest what soever in sinking so much money into something that's going to be used a few times. It's not a hobby.

I hope you don't take the comments you've received as pure, unadulterated snobbery. There's a lot of truth in the idiom "buy cheap, buy twice" when it comes to cycling gear. While you don't have to go to Hincanpie-esq levels of spending (;)), buying the cheapest equipment you can will only serve to make your excursions less enjoyable. A used touring bike such as the one George linked to would be a lot more suited to the sort of thing you're planning. You may be able to pick up a decent used hybrid bike for £200 (that's what I paid for my Specialized Globe), but then you'll have to add a rack, panniers, pump, bottle cages + bottles, spare tubes, etc - this all adds up. I'm all for people getting out on their bikes - had I not gotten into cycling I'd probably still be a 23 stone slob - but you will probably end up hating cycling if you insist on buying a rubbish bike.

If you really do only want this bike to do your tour on, then you might want to consider hiring a bike rather than buying one. At least then you'll know you've got a fully serviced, mechanically sound bike to do your 580 miles on. Just make sure you take a bunch of patches and some spare tubes, as you'll almost certainly get a puncture.

As for getting ready to actually do the ride, I echo the sentiments of the others. Doing 50 miles in a day is not a big deal if you are reasonably fit, but sitting on a saddle for hours a day is something you need to condition yourself to. I cycled to Brighton with a friend of mine last year, covering about 75 miles over 5 hours. Prior to this he'd only ever cycled 13 miles in one go. He coped just fine with the physical exertion, but he said that the saddle ruined him, whereas I had no such problem. If you're taking it easy and only cycling 10 or so miles at a time then stopping to rest then it'll go a long way to alleviate the problem, but it's still something you should be aware of.

By the way, I'm not saying this to try to put you off - quite the contrary in fact, it sounds great. It really will be a lot more enjoyable if you put in some time and effort in order to prepare, and that's really the point I think we've been trying to make. I hope you've not taken some of the more "militant cyclist" opinions too harshly - some people are very passionate about their cycling :)


Now this is reasonable and a great read! Thanks. I understand you've got to pay and truth be told, as long as I get something that will keep it's value, I have no problems paying the extra and selling it later on. :)

Would you know of any decent places to rent bikes, as that's a superb option I hadn't considered.


The whole saddle issue is something that I hadn't thought about, guess I'll need to get a bike fairly soon so as to get used to it. :)

Thanks again for the great post.
 
I used to cycle everyday and was doing 50+ miles fairly easily.

The best advise i can give is get used to sitting on the saddle for long periods and the only way to do that is get out there!
12mph was my starting pace and at that speed you can go all day without really exerting yourself.

I haven't cycled in 8months and i know i would be sore after 10mins back on the saddle!

Enjoy :)
 
Are you trying to put cycling out the reach of everyone who dosen't want to pay a ridiculous sum of money? I've no doubt that your bike is probably way better than my bike could ever be, but I don't have any interest what soever in sinking so much money into something that's going to be used a few times. It's not a hobby.
I really don't think he meant it that way. The examples he gave were simply to illustrate that £200 is not much money for a bicycle, given how easy it is to spend that sort of money on accessories. Even a cheap cycling jersey will set you back £20, and the decent ones are often much more, for example. It's like anything though; if it's something you're into, value for money takes on a different meaning.


Now this is reasonable and a great read! Thanks. I understand you've got to pay and truth be told, as long as I get something that will keep it's value, I have no problems paying the extra and selling it later on. :)

Would you know of any decent places to rent bikes, as that's a superb option I hadn't considered.


The whole saddle issue is something that I hadn't thought about, guess I'll need to get a bike fairly soon so as to get used to it. :)

Thanks again for the great post.
I can't give you any suggestions as I've not hired a bicycle for longer than a weekend. I would urge you to get out on whatever bike you already have as much as you can, just to get used to being in that position for extended periods. Obviously we've all made a lot of comments about the saddle, but you have four other contact points with the bike to consider, and they need to be conditioned to some degree. I have found that, on my longer rides, my wrists start to ache before the saddle causes me any discomfort. You don't have to go dozens of miles at a time to begin with, just work your way up to it.

Just to give you a very rough idea, when I got my first bike as an adult in 2010, the first "proper" ride I did was 11 miles. It damn near killed me. The next weekend, I went out and did 16 miles, and it wasn't anywhere near as bad (I was cycling 8.5 miles a day to work and back, which probably helped). Within a month I was up to 35 miles in one go without difficulty.

Showboat said:
The best advise i can give is get used to sitting on the saddle for long periods and the only way to do that is get out there!

Enjoy
This is good advice. You don't need to go fast to begin with, you just need to get accustomed to long periods on the bike :)
 
On the topic of hire bikes:
Where are you going? You'll be more likely to find a good hire shop in the areas which are more popular with cyclists (obviously :p). The south coast and towards the Alps/Pyrenees are likely to be good. Also the north east and into belgium.

Expect to pay your full £200 budget for 2 weeks of hire though.
 
Are you trying to put cycling out the reach of everyone who dosen't want to pay a ridiculous sum of money? I've no doubt that your bike is probably way better than my bike could ever be, but I don't have any interest what soever in sinking so much money into something that's going to be used a few times. It's not a hobby.

*sigh*

I was doing my best to help you. I did ask you not to take my comments the wrong way, I was just trying to get you to realise that doing it properly is a more costly pursuit then you seem to think. I would hate for you to end up in the middle of nowhere with a puncture or torn tyre and not be able to sort it out because you haven't taken the right equipment, or exhausted and find every day a struggle because you've bought a **** bike that just robs you of energy.

Cycling is my life. I love doing it and I love watching it. I appreciate it might not be the same for you.

If you don't want to buy a decent bike, how about hiring one? You'll need to look into the details yourself obviously, I wouldn't know what you get for your money or how good value it is. I've had a look and this place looks OK.
 
Just to add a different perspective from someone who has toured a lot. My ex-fiancee was happy to tour on a £280 Trek 7.1FX hybrid for holidays that were significantly longer than 50 miles/day. Add in a rack and panniers for another £100, a pump, helmet, bike lock, tubes, repair kit and a couple of pairs of padded shorts and off you trot. She steadfastly refused to use cycling shoes, instead using her running trainers.

I'm sure that with a bit of ingenuity you could locate a suitable second hand bike and get yourself off round Europe.

Unless you are dramatically out of shape, 50 miles a day will be well within your reach. Plan for an average 10mph, a long lunch and frequent stops to admire the scenery and you'll be pleasantly surprised how easy it is. By planning for 10mph you build in contingency to your schedule to allow for punctures and getting lost.

There will be days, terrain dependent, where the going is a bit tougher but thats the thing about touring, mentally you just get through it. Indeed the advice that I would take on board from the previous posters is get your bottom used to sitting on a bike seat and take along some sudocreme for when the inevitable sores occurs :)
 
Are you trying to put cycling out the reach of everyone who dosen't want to pay a ridiculous sum of money? I've no doubt that your bike is probably way better than my bike could ever be, but I don't have any interest what soever in sinking so much money into something that's going to be used a few times. It's not a hobby.

Are you kidding? It's a misconception that cycling is cheap.

I'd love to do the Gunball rally but unfortunately I can't afford a £50k second hand supercar. If I posted in Motors asking for a £1k recommendation to do it in I'd get told a thing or too as well. It's nothing about putting you off, it's just realistic.

You can't even buy any bike new for less than £200, let alone expect to get a decent one capable of doing what you're asking of it (plus everything else that comes with it).

I did exactly what you're doing last year when I went to watch the TdF. I already had a bike but I still spent probably £500 on accessories, and none of that was over the top, it just adds up.
 
I'll echo the sentiments of the other people here. You will need a road type bike or you will find the 50 miles a lot less enjoyable than it could be. If you take a POS cheap bike you will find that you have problems and if it breaks in the middle of nowhere when it is peeing it down you will not be a happy bunny.

If you are simply planning to move the bike on after your trip why don't you spend a little more? Can't you borrow a few hundred off the parents on the condition you pay it back. You could get yourself set up for £500-600 that would make the whole trip much more fun and you won't spend any more than you were originally suggesting.
 
I've looked on eBay and this is the sort of thing you should be looking at. You will be able to buy some panniers and the rest of the stuff second hand as well.

.

Nonsense. You don't need a tourer for 50 miles a day cycling. A used hybrid would be fine, a Specialized Sirrus for example.

Make sure that you have your route planned thoroughly before hand and job jobbed.
 
Last edited:
Nonsense. You don't need a tourer for 50 miles a day cycling. A used hybrid would be fine, a Specialized Sirrus for example.

You dont need a tourer if you're only cycling 50 miles a day.
But if you're doing a self-supported 2 week camping trip on a normal road bike, you'd better buy a shirt with some very big pockets.
 
You dont need a tourer if you're only cycling 50 miles a day.
But if you're doing a self-supported 2 week camping trip on a normal road bike, you'd better buy a shirt with some very big pockets.

Again, nonsense. I took my road bike touring for 10 days unsupported with just a rack and panniers. You're forgetting that lower-end road bikes have the braze ons for racks.
 
Again, nonsense. I took my road bike touring for 10 days unsupported with just a rack and panniers. You're forgetting that lower-end road bikes have the braze ons for racks.

Mine doesn't so a tourer seems like a good suggestion to me. It's also likely to have a more relaxed riding position which would suit an inexperienced rider looking to do long days in the saddle.
 
So you suggest buying a road bike and fitting it out as a tourer....to avoid buying a tourer? :confused:

No, I suggested buying a hybrid to save money. The reason I bought a road bike and added a rack is because it's faster to tour on, and also I do riding other than tours.

Mine doesn't so a tourer seems like a good suggestion to me. It's also likely to have a more relaxed riding position which would suit an inexperienced rider looking to do long days in the saddle.

A tourer that is two or three times as much as he wants to spend seems a bad idea to me.
 
Back
Top Bottom