I has a new toy!

Soldato
Joined
31 Mar 2006
Posts
6,606
Location
Sydney Australia
Nothing really amazing but I thought I'd share.

lens18-200mm.jpg


I'm off to India in a couple of weeks so I was thinking that this would be a good addition to the 50mm f/1.8 and Sigma 10-20mm. Means I have a little length and also can leave my 18-70mm kit at home. I'll have to chuck it on the D300s when I get home and have a play. Not a terrible feeling lens at all tho and not bad at £410.
 
Yeah - I figured at £400 ish it wasn't a bad gamble as I can flog it off for around the same again. Having said that the 18-70 wasn't stunningly clear IMO (altho just quietly that might be down to my average photography skills LOL).
 
I took two DX bodies to India loaded with a 17-55/2.8 and a 70-200/2.8, and there were times when I would've prefered your setup. Here's my set from this time last year in case you're interested. For what it's worth, Jaipur was the highlight.
 
I took two DX bodies to India loaded with a 17-55/2.8 and a 70-200/2.8, and there were times when I would've prefered your setup. Here's my set from this time last year in case you're interested. For what it's worth, Jaipur was the highlight.

Awesome - love the set and I don't see any issues with sharpness in there. Loving the monkeys as well - stoked. We're flying into Delhi, then doing the golden triangle - Agra and Jaipur then flying down to Kerala to see a bit of jungle and do a river boat cruise before going to sit on a beach.

Really looking forward to it - your photos are a great look at some things to expect.
 
You guys not thought about just taking 1 single prime lens?

That's a pretty big ask in my opinion. I love having the excellent wide angle of the 10-20mm with me especially when travelling because it does give quite a bit more context to some shots. I also like to have the option of chucking a prime on but recently I've had the odd shot (especially people shots) where the extra length of a zoom allows for some versatility. I am a big fan of the 50mm but sometimes I feel it's narrow FOV limits some compositions.

I'd hate to go somewhere half way around the world and find that I don't have the tools to capture what I want.
 
Isn't that just an arbitrary bragging point Raymond? I think most people who can take decent photos with a range of focal lengths can do the same on a prime.

No, but 2 bodies and 2 lenses seems a lot for travel?

Unless the point of the trip is to get photos then fair enough. I am just talking from a practical and weight perspective. Sure I would have liked to have a wide angle inside the colosseum, or a fish eye amongst the skyscrapers in HK but I didn't because glass are not light.

Another point, I think it improves one's photography anyway. The logical thing to do, like above, is to take a wide angle in those situations, one where a million other people has done before. Probably stood in the exact same spot and took the same shot. But restrict yourself to a prime, you might think you will miss some shots, and you probably will, but it also make you more creative.

I went to HK twice with my 30D, first time with my 16-35, second time with my 50mm. The photos from the 50mm is a lot better. I would have thought it would be the other way round too but it turned out different.

Limitation might just be a way to open up one's vision.

But that's just me.
 
Awesome - love the set and I don't see any issues with sharpness in there. Loving the monkeys as well - stoked. We're flying into Delhi, then doing the golden triangle - Agra and Jaipur then flying down to Kerala to see a bit of jungle and do a river boat cruise before going to sit on a beach.

Really looking forward to it - your photos are a great look at some things to expect.

Thanks :) The autofocus on my 70-200 gave out whilst I was there, so it was a bit of a struggle. Mostly monkeys...but I like monkeys :p

I didn't enjoy Agra much...it didn't help that I was there on a holy day, but the Taj Mahal was rammed and the constant attention from sellers and beggars was at its worst there. Make sure you find the rear view of the Taj Mahal from across the river, many seem to miss that. Good call on Kerala, I didn't go there myself, but I prefered the south in general - much more relaxed and less touristy (though it still has its fair share of tourist-type attractions). I started in Tiruchirapalli, moved slowly north-east by road to Chennai, before (quickly) doing the golden triangle.
 
Last edited:
I know what you mean Raymond, I've been out with primes before and got shots I wouldn't have otherwise but if I'm doing a big trip a extra few hundred grams isn't a big deal. I find the main issue is the size of the body rather than the lens anyway!
 
Back
Top Bottom