I has Sandybridge - Excellent service OCUK

@3.4ghz XFX 6870 Black Edition 1050/1250/1.250


3DMark Score
P4838
Graphics score
4490
Physics Score
8432
Combined Score
4580
GraphicsTest1
21.58 FPS
GraphicsTest2
22.23 FPS
GraphicsTest3
27.32 FPS
GraphicsTest4
13.0 FPS
PhysicsTest
26.77 FPS
CombinedTest
21.3 FPS
Click to expand...
OK, at the revised 4ghz same graphics etc

http://3dmark.com/3dm11/368459;jsessionid=2E56AEF6F5E798D88650378BF520D1C4

3DMark Score
P5050
Graphics score
4685
Physics Score
9305
Combined Score
4586
GraphicsTest1
22.39 FPS
GraphicsTest2
23.01 FPS
GraphicsTest3
28.85 FPS
GraphicsTest4
13.59 FPS
PhysicsTest
29.54 FPS
CombinedTest
21.33 FPS
 
Last edited:
Pointless, but a wei score @ 4ghz - interestingly, my ssd has gone from 6.7 to 6.8 :S

165677_494715531493_659761493_6254044_7237450_n.jpg
 
do you have any benchies from your old system to compare to? Would be good if you could let us people who've held on from c2q to get these (as no one seems to compare this lol).

Want to see if its worthwhile or not, dont really want to impulse buy.
 
Gangster said:
do you have any benchies from your old system to compare to? Would be good if you could let us people who've held on from c2q to get these (as no one seems to compare this lol).

Want to see if its worthwhile or not, dont really want to impulse buy.
Click to expand...

Yeah I agree, I've been with my 4ghz E8400 for a few years now, wondering whether its worth it. lol
 
dave_beast said:
OK, at the revised 4ghz same graphics etc

http://3dmark.com/3dm11/368459;jsessionid=2E56AEF6F5E798D88650378BF520D1C4

3DMark Score
P5050
Graphics score
4685
Physics Score
9305
Combined Score
4586
GraphicsTest1
22.39 FPS
GraphicsTest2
23.01 FPS
GraphicsTest3
28.85 FPS
GraphicsTest4
13.59 FPS
PhysicsTest
29.54 FPS
CombinedTest
21.33 FPS
Click to expand...

Not much of an increase in the graphics test fps.

Seems like the 6870 is going to be a bottleneck in gaming and the i5 2600K won't be helping much.
 
seekdestroy said:
Yeah I agree, I've been with my 4ghz E8400 for a few years now, wondering whether its worth it. lol
Click to expand...

I know some people will say, well if it beats a 920 (example) it'll beat a q6600. Problem is there are no q6600 vs 920 tests so its hard to measure how 'much' it beats it by.

Im wanting the comparison, but then I'm not because its going to tempt me to get SB !
 
Gangster said:
do you have any benchies from your old system to compare to? Would be good if you could let us people who've held on from c2q to get these (as no one seems to compare this lol).

Want to see if its worthwhile or not, dont really want to impulse buy.
Click to expand...

http://3dmark.com/3dm11/120731;jsessionid=88397645086EFFFCC01145D0C3DE5F48

C2Q Q9400 @3.6 left, i7 2600k @ 4ghz right

3DMark Score
P4517 P5050
Graphics score
4683 4685
Physics Score
4306 9305
Combined Score
3794 4586
GraphicsTest1
22.5 FPS 22.39 FPS
GraphicsTest2
23.1 FPS 23.01 FPS
GraphicsTest3
28.66 FPS 28.85 FPS
GraphicsTest4
13.55 FPS 13.59 FPS
PhysicsTest
13.67 FPS 29.54 FPS
CombinedTest
17.65 FPS 21.33 FPS
 
Last edited:
thecomputerguy said:
E8400 @ 4GHZ still very capable in gaming its a fantastic chip m8 wait for the IVY
Click to expand...

But will IVY really be worth the wait? Whens that? Q4 2011? Q1 2012?

*EDIT*
Interesting results dave_beast. Your GraphicTest1 and 2 show just just slightly less fps, and graphics score, is only 2 more. but the Physics scores are quite a lot more.
 
single 6870 i5 750 @ 4.2ghz

3DMark Score
P4720
Graphics score
4394
Physics Score
8127
Combined Score
4404
GraphicsTest1
21.03 FPS
GraphicsTest2
21.63 FPS
GraphicsTest3
27.07 FPS
GraphicsTest4
12.72 FPS
PhysicsTest
25.8 FPS
CombinedTest
20.48 FPS
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom