Soldato
Moon landing.
.. which period would you be most interested in visiting that's become legend in our history books?
To be more specific, which historical events would you like to see happening or which specific person would you like to see for real. You'll not be in any danger, you'll be in a sort of protective bubble and just able to observe.
Would it be the Battle of Hastings? Seeing the apple actually falling on Isaac Newton's head? Perhaps seeing Henry Vlll? Seeing Mary Queen of Scots? Being a fly on the wall and watching Beethoven actually composing and playing his 5th symphony? Seeing Merlin5 as he constructs brilliant threads? Watching the pyramids as they were built?
Always give the same answer to this question. I know it’s grim in the grand scheme of the worlds history, but I would have to go back to 1888 and find out the true identity of Jack the Ripper. Read so many books, changed my mind so many times and realistically, the only hope of ever solving it, is through time travel.
2001, LA, the set of filmmaker Russ Meyer's final movie, Pandora Peaks. Rounding off a personal journey that started with 10 year old cheesyboy and a copy of The Sun newspaper featuring pics of the eponymous, and extremely top-heavy, PP siteseeing around London in a flimsy pink dress.
Or maybe the fall of Troy. Both have pros and cons.
I'd go back a few years armed with all the results of the sports games played and make myself filthy rich through betting
Apparently that doesn't work. I've heard that if you grab the next set of lotto numbers and go back in time to play it, the numbers will come out different. My cynical mind therefore thinks the same when it comes to sports matches.
I think I would like a really good walk around the Roman Empire. First through the streets amongst the common folk and then through the palaces and halls of power. I suspect I'd find it strangely modern in many ways, but equally fascinating. If you want specific events, Caesar's return to Rome immediately after crossing the Rubicon. I'd like to settle in my mind if he was a "Goodie" or a "Baddie".
Mine would be very similar - I'd like to find out what his plans really were. Was he intending to stablise the empire and then stand down as dictator and return the empire to the republican system it had before? Or was he planning on keeping the empire as a dictatorship?
I think we'd both need to hang around for a while rather than be at just one specific event and maybe we couldn't find the answers within the constraints of this hypothetical setting. All we can do is observe, so we wouldn't even be able to ask him anything. We'd have to piece an answer together from things he said, wrote or did.
Or maybe I'd go to the university of ancient Alexandria, including the libraries. Or watch Eratosthenes measuring the shadow of the stick. Or Euclid laying the foundation for most of maths for the next couple of millenia. Or maybe I'd spend so long trying to decide that I didn't go anywhere/when.
I'd like to be in the Colosseum around the first century watching a gladiatorial battle against man and beasts.
Also, can you imagine witnessing Naumachia. The Romans were willing to go to any measures to satisfy their depraved lust for violence, and bloodshed. They invented possibly the most extreme game of all time, by flooding the Colosseum with water, and then forcing ship crews to go to naval warfare with each other. The ships would fight it out until only one was left. The first Naumachia was between 2000 combatants, and 4000 rowers. 20 fully armed naval ships in total. Because of the large number of contestants, and the power of Roman ships, Naumachiae was extremely bloody. Seeing the carnage nowadays would leave most people scarred beyond repair, but the Roman citizens revelled in it.
Seeing the carnage nowadays would leave most people scarred beyond repair, but the Roman citizens revelled in it.