if you work you really dont want to read this
- Thread starter mattheman
- Start date
Reading it indicates that Labour are saying there wont be a 3p tax rise if they are re-elected......
What it really says is that the civil service has been infiltrated by tory-nazis and is trying to fix the election with a goverment smear campaign!*
*note this maybe a slight exaggeration
What it really says is that the civil service has been infiltrated by tory-nazis and is trying to fix the election with a goverment smear campaign!*
*note this maybe a slight exaggeration
you cant vote lib lab or tory because they are all the same.
![[FnG]magnolia](/styles/overclockers/avatars/9.png){kind=avatar}
Caporegime
Except that, well, they're not at all, are they?
And even if they were all the same, would the BNP fix this issue to your satisfaction?Hopefully you can bring the same level of financial and economic clarity to this tax issue as you are to the post you're embarrasing yourself in over at Speaker's Corner.
Man of Honour
You're right, I do work and I didn't want to read it. Although not for the obvious reason that income tax might go up, mainly I didn't want to read it because at present it is little more than supposition.
However I am much more concerned about potential £2 billion savings looked for in school spending.
However I am much more concerned about potential £2 billion savings looked for in school spending.
Let's look at recent claims made by the tories that have been met with initial denial and outright lies followed eventually by the truth.... Tory cuts vs Labour investment anyone?
Soldato
Simple - fire all the retards who can't stick with the already fantastically short working year. The ones that can't work for four weeks of a term without having a week + off thus needing supply teacher cover at a ridiculous cost.
It's been rife at my wife's school, but alas, there is nothing that can be done due to contractual/union agreements.
Nothing more than this at the moment.
Last edited:
Associate
I cannot understand this mentallity at all. Labour has bloated the public sector with non jobs and employing quite a few people that arent particually good at what there supposed to be doing.
Have education standards risen after labour throwing money at it? From everything i have read the answer is no, standards have slipt. Money isnt always the answer.
Man of Honour
How have you reached this conclusion?
Associate
Ill openly admit i do not know for sure that standards are lower now and that my opinion's are formed entirely on the discussions with a teacher i know who has over 25 years teaching experiance, things i have heard from my brother who has just started his A levels and newpaper articles.
I may well be wrong as it is impossible to prove. Education results we are told are improving year on year, yet i also read that we have record youth unemployment.
My main point is that throwing money at something does not always result in improvement.
Associate
Soldato
We're going to have to pay for the bankers bonuses...er... bank bailouts. Financial pain is coming for the working man and it doesn't matter who you vote for.
Soldato
Oh boy, round and round we go, where she stops, nobody knows!
Flawed arguments based on the concept of a static curriculum, just as someone from the 20's couldn't comprehend the notion of spacetime as something he would use in everyday life, nor can we realistically use many concepts taught back then in our every day lives.
Flawed arguments based on the concept of a static curriculum, just as someone from the 20's couldn't comprehend the notion of spacetime as something he would use in everyday life, nor can we realistically use many concepts taught back then in our every day lives.
Arn;t these bailouts going to turn a profit in time though, like the airbus thing.