'I'm Harriet Harman - you know where you can get me...'

Jokester · 4 Oct 2009 at 13:39

dangerstat said:
This all comes down to our understanding of the universe until now people only believed in forces like gravity and elctromagnetism. But there is a stronger force, a force which draws every retarded peice of trash news and concentrates into 50 pages of dense excrement lablled the Daily Mail. People worry that when we smash sub atomic particles together at CERN they'll create a black hole, when in reality I think they find the universe is made up of "immigrants taking uor jeerrrrwwwbsss", "grannies getting attacked by hoodies", etc...

But it still doesn't mean that they can defame individuals.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/new...ed-of-crashing-car-while-on-mobile-phone.html

Or are you going to call into question The Telegraphs reporting as well?

dirtydog · 4 Oct 2009 at 13:41

dangerstat said:
This all comes down to our understanding of the universe until now people only believed in forces like gravity and elctromagnetism. But there is a stronger force, a force which draws every retarded peice of trash news and concentrates into 50 pages of dense excrement lablled the Daily Mail. People worry that when we smash sub atomic particles together at CERN they'll create a black hole, when in reality I think they find the universe is made up of "immigrants taking uor jeerrrrwwwbsss", "grannies getting attacked by hoodies", etc...

I bet there are countless articles I could cite which you would endorse, if you didn't know they were in the Mail.

semi-pro waster · 4 Oct 2009 at 13:53

I'm mostly disappointed that Mrs Harman couldn't come up with a response to compete with the frankly genius "I'm the Bishop of Southwark. It's what I do" as apparantly said personage managed when queried doing something he shouldn't.

scorza · 4 Oct 2009 at 13:58

Jokester said:
Yeah, because libel doesn't apply to them. Why do they think the law doesn't apply to them?

An allegation has been made, and the Mail is reporting that allegation. Innocent until proven guilty and all that.

Jokester · 4 Oct 2009 at 14:00

scorza said:
An allegation has been made, and the Mail is reporting that allegation. Innocent until proven guilty and all that.

Dangerstat's accusation was that there was no truth to the story, ie there was no allegation.

dangerstat · 4 Oct 2009 at 14:03

Jokester said:
Dangerstat's accusation was that there was no truth to the story, ie there was no allegation.

I didn't say there was no truth, just 0.0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000002% truth,

I wouldn't for a second be surprised if it was of Camron's staff driving in Harman's car when she was parrked and using the phone, and she actually said "I'm Herriet Harman, you can get into touch with me at this number 423948234".

SHEDDER1uk · 4 Oct 2009 at 14:21

Im sure she will use the security risk clause and get away with it.

The Funktopus · 4 Oct 2009 at 14:53

If only this were the final nail in the coffin of the career of that sexist pig. God how I can't stand her. :mad:

arc@css · 4 Oct 2009 at 14:55

Jokester said:
I hope they throw the book at her, especially the bit about being on her mobile.

This.

alex24 · 4 Oct 2009 at 15:00

Jokester said:
I hope they throw the book at her, especially the bit about being on her mobile.

Agreed. What better person to make an example of? Everybody would hear about it.

The Halk · 4 Oct 2009 at 15:07

I hope the allegations are true, and I hope they are proven. Perhaps mobile phone records could be used to prove she was on the phone?

Surfer · 4 Oct 2009 at 15:40

Anyone live nearby to her? Make a citizens arrest. A crime has been comitted afterall. (unless the numerous witnesses are all telling porkies

)

JIM_BOB7813 · 4 Oct 2009 at 16:20

AJK said:
The reason HH (and most people abusing positions of power, for that matter) believe that the rules don't apply is because they don't, to them.

Too true.

meghatronic · 4 Oct 2009 at 21:37

Jokester said:
I hope they throw the book at her, especially the bit about being on her mobile.

I hope they LITERALLY throw the book at her.

Hopefully the book being a hardcover War and Peace.

alexakasloth · 4 Oct 2009 at 22:27

It may be quoted from the daily fail, but I do think she should at least have a few weeks in prison practicing 'slippery slippery soap'.

geekyEd · 4 Oct 2009 at 22:38

We need a law by which constituents can vote to sack their MP.

Vonhelmet · 4 Oct 2009 at 22:41

meghatronic said:
I hope they LITERALLY throw the book at her.

Hopefully the book being a hardcover War and Peace.

Why bother? Just throw the actual statute book at her. Those things are massive.

meghatronic · 4 Oct 2009 at 22:41

BluZiff said:
We need a law by which constituents can vote to sack their MP.

But they wouldn't vote, or they'd be retarded.

E.g. a friend of mine now is going to vote Labour, solely as Cameron will reverse the fox hunting ban. That's literally the sole reason.

vonhelmet said:
Why bother? Just throw the actual statute book at her. Those things are massive.

I was trying to think of a big book

digipeep · 4 Oct 2009 at 23:57

Jokester said:
I hope they throw the book at her, especially the bit about being on her mobile.

Oh they will like the other Labour politician caught using their mobile. That person killed someone and was sent to prison for about one week before being bailed out.

Nothing will come from this but it doesn't change the fact that Harriot Harmann is the most odious politican we have in parliament.

wordy · 5 Oct 2009 at 11:23

digipeep said:
Nothing will come from this but it doesn't change the fact that Harriot Harmann is the most odious politican we have in parliament.

Quoted for the unfortunate truth.

She is the main reason I won't be voting Labour at the next elections.