Soldato
It's a point to raise at least. Not signing the policy shouldn't mean you can be excused for wreckless behaviour.
Indeed, The policy we had in place stopped user logging in until they signed the agreement, At which point their account was unlocked. Just something to think about![]()

Looks like they are inviting the wrong person to a D.P
Lol, why do you say that?
How do I go about speak to a union rep? Never done this type of thing before.
He has a contract that says he should not save important docs locally.
He did and they was lost. So he has not done his job as he should.
Don't you know who your union rep is?
Yes your right, he should have a backup and there is a system we use called Document Management but he hasn't used that properly either.
IT should make sure that no data (or at least important data) is stored locally on the machine through policies and mapped network drives. The network drives should also be backed up.

I'd make this point, if its not in a place to be backed up, its his problem, also...if you've migrated? Have you done clean installs or what? Surely the files would be stored locally somewhere if its an upgrade?
Oh and this...this happens where I work, we re-iterate the fact that locally stored files are not backed up, save them to a user area on the server where it IS backed up!
If people took their machines to a repair shop to have the OS upgraded and had it returned to them with a blank OS and all their files gone, they'd be absolutely livid.
Actually, I used to work for a repair company and when you sent away your laptop for example to be 'checked over' it would guaranteed be coming back to you blank.
yes they said back up data before hand, but they'd literally restart a fresh install, even if there wasn't a problem with the damn hard drive

A bit confused as to why this is being laid on the OPs lap, sounds like management on both sides have cocked up. IT for not having backups enforced and his own department for not ensuring backups were being checked/carried out by users who were properly trained.
I'd be particularly annoyed if I was hauled into this on the day I return without having any official warning or time to prepare.
If there was no plan or documentation with little or no supervision by more senior members of IT then it can't possibly be landed on the OP. I'm a senior in our team and the buck stops with me, not the guys who work under me if I haven't trained or given them proper documentation and guidance. Department structure seems messed up where the OP works, the buck doesn't stop at the person who's doing the work if he/she has had little or no support to carry out important duties.
Was there ever a risk assessment done, I hate them but this sort of failure to backup due to long paths etc is something that should have been recognised and checked. Likewise a backup of the old systems could have been made "just in case."
LOL if they tried to blame you because he hadn't signed the document!
So you have to backup users stuff until they sign it! If i were a user i'd never sign it.
You could accept a portion of the blame, but not all of it.
Good luck in there hearing, when is it?