• Insane Realtime Destruction And Physics - CryEngine 2014 •

Tonester0011 · 6 Apr 2014 at 12:31

Looks pretty crap tbh.

shankly1985 · 6 Apr 2014 at 12:31

Nice
One thing people forget how Good Crysis 1,2,3 Physics are they is some very nice stuff in there.

Silent_Scone · 6 Apr 2014 at 13:44

Tonester0011 said:
Looks pretty crap tbh.

Yeah, see that level of destruction in games all the time...

:rolleyes:

Kids these days.

Gregster · 6 Apr 2014 at 13:48

Tonester0011 said:
Looks pretty crap tbh.

Yer, I am not impressed.

Wizzfizz · 6 Apr 2014 at 13:48

Tonester0011 said:
Looks pretty crap tbh.

I was thinking just the same.

shankly1985 · 6 Apr 2014 at 13:48

His specs: Just thought would be nice to ask him what he was running.

CPU: i5 3570k @4.5Ghz- 4.8Ghz Turbo
GPU: R9 290
Motherboard: Asus Maximus V Gene z77
RAM: 8GB Corsair Vengeance LP
PSU: Corsair AX750 80 Plus Gold Fully Modular
SSD: 250GB Kingston 500MB/S Read and Write
CPU Cooler: Antek Kuhler H20 920
Case: Coolermaster Storm Enforcer

Pants · 6 Apr 2014 at 13:56

Next Car Game already looks more impressive than this.

tommybhoy · 6 Apr 2014 at 14:12

Next Car Game looks more impressive than any other destruction api to date.

Tonester0011 · 6 Apr 2014 at 14:16

MjFrosty said:
Yeah, see that level of destruction in games all the time...

Kids these days.

For a tech demo, looks crap

As for games, closest we've got for real time destruction is NCG, that looks better than this demo :rolleyes:

Old timers these days

Paul11 · 6 Apr 2014 at 14:45

im not sure if people are missing the point, its not meant to "look" good, its meant to show the physics and interaction between objects

it can be made to look good later

PCM2 · 6 Apr 2014 at 14:47

I find the one where the aircraft wing went through it interesting. You were left with half of the board floating in mid-air. Physics win.

But I agree, some good potential here. Not really the most inspiring way to show the technology off though.

Silent_Scone · 6 Apr 2014 at 15:24

tommybhoy said:
Next Car Game looks more impressive than any other destruction api to date.

Next car game doesn't have the same interaction? It's all soft body collision mesh damage?

What are you people even doing half the time at your computers

jh30uk · 6 Apr 2014 at 15:24

Fapping to pr0n.

OLDPHART · 6 Apr 2014 at 15:37

Paul11 said:
im not sure if people are missing the point, its not meant to "look" good, its meant to show the physics and interaction between objects

it can be made to look good later

+1, some can't see the wood for the trees.

ElliorR · 6 Apr 2014 at 15:52

That video is all well and good but the question is will it play Crysis?

Calin Banc · 6 Apr 2014 at 16:20

The geometry/mash/whatever is quite nice, reminds me of the snowdrop engine. If you take out frostbyte and considering there aren't going to be anymore Red Faction games, this could be something nice going on. However, developers still need to put that extra love into it and at least compared the physix, it will run on all hardware.

Sacrifice · 6 Apr 2014 at 16:44

In some of them, the trees were sped up, which makes me believe this wasn't realtime, more sped up.

Final8y · 6 Apr 2014 at 17:38

While there was some variation in shape, the pieces were the same size.

Buckster · 6 Apr 2014 at 17:44

<edit>ignore