I often get accused of slanting videos to suit an agenda but in this case it was too important to allow that accusation to hold any water. This is the first time I've used most of the sources word-for-word.
Much of the "difficulty" in a video like this is finding the information and also confirming that the information you've found is accurate and backed up by multiple sources. You'd be amazed at how often 30-minute videos can be taken apart due to one mistake.
But again, I do agree that I thought it was quite boring in parts - it really was just me outing the evidence that was already there - but the thing here is that it was never really put across coherently and certainly never for the YouTube generation.