It doesn't just come down to personal preference. For sure it plays a part in it but it's also a very objective thing. The argument about the realities of the devices certainly comes into play even when the subjective nature of personal preference may hold the overriding sway on the final purchase decision.
I think your observation is a bit biased and ignores the case that many Apple users are unable to be critical about the devices that they are presented with (by Apple) and also the various nuances of the Apple ecosystem, be they positive or negative. The same can be said for Android and the Google ecosystem. The ability to differentiate the two and actually be objective seems to escape most people including you. Personal preference is all well and good but it shouldn't interrupt with good objective observation nor should it ignore the fact that everyone is entitled to an opinion.
There is a real sense of "I want to love my Apple devices regardless of objectivity so please just leave us alone in our Apple section to spread the self love around among other like minds". Forgive me, but I thought that this was a public forum. Being such should mean that we have a freedom to post our opinions where and when we like?
There is a great irony in pointing out that Android fanboys are very fanatic in their defence of 'their OS of choice' because I'd observe very similar behaviour in many Apple fanboys would you not?
Is it not possible that some of the objective observation is actually fact driven, makes a good point (regardless if it paints Apple in a bad light) and highlights somewhere that Apple could well improve upon? If it's all about personal preference then why should you get so wound up about people pointing out various aspects of the devices? It seems to me that you would like to be paying your money to get the 'best device' and having someone point it out that you're actually just getting the best Apple device makes you uncomfortable. Of course this shouldn't matter because it's all 'personal preference'...
In my slumber I may have missed a post about it, but...
Nano-sims...yay or nay?
That's all I wanted to know thanks
So I take it I have to call up o2 and ask for a nano sim? Or will I have to wait until next Friday?
Never mind, just ordered my SIM. That was easy!
A special section? That's a bit strong, apple phones only got their own section to stop arguments like this occurring, not because they are in any way superior.
However.....
Whats all this about £25 for an adapter for the charger? I currently have a charger at work, one at home, one at my desk, a dock in my car and a speaker dock. Are Apple really suggesting i have to either
a) Spend £125 just to maintain the same level of convenience or
b) Spend £25 on one and carry it round absolutely everywhere?
Thats on top of whatever o2 want to charge me to upgrade?
I have no issue with Apple changing the connection but is this not taking the pee a little?
Also in practical terms i do question the need to continue to make things "slimmer and lighter" rather than truly up the battery levels? I do a bit of travelling where i may spend most of the day on planes and trains and i really struggle to use the phone as a true ipod replacement because by the end of the day the battery runs down to such an extent that i feel i could be compromising the device being used as a phone so i end up taking both ipod and iphone with me. In practical terms a major shift in battery life and an increase in storage capacity would have been far more of a "game changer" than just trying to make it look a bit different.
I know in reality i will probably upgrade but for the first time i do feel a bit cheated by Apple, and i say that as someone with a number of Apple products.
I dunno, I took it to be that you were sick of people with differing opinions coming in and sullying the Apple love in... To be fair you did use some pretty emotive language and it was aimed pretty squarely at Android users.
I think it's worth pointing out that there are no Blackberry users or Windows Mobile users in here, in fact the OS's are largely ignored, and I'd suggest that is because they aren't that good. With both iOS and Android the 'fanboyism' is bred from an overwhelming factor -they're both very good operating systems, unfortunately for Apple they have chosen to capitalise on their market share by making a very small evolution of the iPhone. They were behind the game long before the Galaxy S2 came out and they're falling even further behind because they have locked themselves into a deep seated ecosystem corral. They simply can't afford to alienate either their users or their developers whereas Google has based their OS on a broad, largely unfettered and varied base which means that diversity is their friend. Change is good for them.
This is not to take away from the iPhone being a brilliant device and having an excellent level of intuitiveness. That I believe is inarguable, but the fact that it has not appreciably changed in the last 3-4 years, that is also inarguable. Customers want something new and flashy, they want to be blown away like they were when the iPhone and iPad first made an appearance - to quote a reviewer "they have simply left people whelmed".
Those adaptors look useless as well. If have your car wired for iphone with cradle or an iphone shape dock moulded into hifi, there is no way on earth you can possibly fit an inch tall adapter inbetween old socket and the phone. Crazy. Just crazy. Killed the product for millions of people.
Personally, other than some functional streamlining, I don't think that there is much that needs to be added to iOS but at this stage it doesn't make a huge amount of difference. The hardware is effectively the same (aesthetically) and the OS looks identical. The gentle evolution is all well and good but, like I've said earlier, people like to think that they're getting a new device when they upgrade. It still looks virtually the same as the first iphone. Apple did an amazing job in creating a stunningly simple and well structured OS (with the hardware they had to work with) and effectively cornered themselves by making it counter intuitive to change anything. They've added to the mess by suing the pants off anyone when they 'copied' from Apple so they can't 'borrow' great functionality nor operational streamlining. They're between the proverbial rock and hard place IMO.
Could you change that to full US LTE, limited worldwide 4G LTE.
The iPhone 5 only supports 1800Mhz in the EU. That's quite big omission for those looking for complete LTE coverage over the next few years.
All the other EU LTE phones, like the Nokia Lumia 920, Samsung Galaxy S3 LTE and One XL, support the major European LTE frequencies (800/1800/2600) for full coverage.
When are we able to pre order on o2, any ideas?
Why cant i just place my order with o2 and just receive when i have stock, hope i don't have to keep ringing to see if they have stock as thats a right pita.
Sam
Cool
Guessing it will be first come first serve?. I'm probably best off just waiting until the hype dies down and then making an order. Id like a white one too and I'm guessing they wont be available for a while as historically black is always released first.
Sam
Anyone managed to order a nano-sim from 02 yet? Can't see anything about it on the 02 website
can someone tell me if the general reception is going to be better than the IP4.
my current phone just doesn't work well enough as a phone! its great for other stuff but they forget about its basic use...!!
Apple cant stand on stage and say that the what you call reception is better because this would admitting there was a problem in the first place. Chances are its fixed but they wont say its fixed
hopefully anyway
No 8GB version?
Great so if I want one I have to pay through the teeth for more space ill never use... >.>
Has the A6 been detailed yet? A15 cores?
Can a mod add a poll to the thread?
Which iPhone are you getting?
- White
- Black
BUY A NANO SIM CUTTER FROM EBAY