Iran's Paris Hilton

You got your head screwed on?

That's ridiculous...what a stupid backwards country. Send her to jail because her bf took advantage and posted a video of her on the net? Get real.
 
Are you nuts? That is the wrongest (pun) idea ever. Imagine you get lashed in public over your sex video that YOU didnt make available on purpose...Iran sucks and Sharia law sucks further.
 
Zip said:
She must have showed her ankles or something :eek: :(

I dont know what kind of sex they have in iran but here in england you tend to show more than your knees in a home made porn unless you have a dogy cameraman...
 
Pretty crap video.

I bet a lot of Iranians go about with their fun before marriage, which makes it pretty hypocritical really. Sharia law can suck my nuts, as well as those who follow it vehemently. Bunch of barbarians.
 
A television presenter was recently sacked for being videoed dancing with a bride he was not related to at a wedding.

Sounds like a hell of a nice place to live to me, quite relaxed. :eek:
 
SB118 said:
Sounds like a hell of a nice place to live to me, quite relaxed. :eek:

There the opposite end of the same spectrum to here... both Iran and the West have problems with their understanding of sexuality, the West have indulged it whereas Iran are in denial. Either attitude sucks
 
cleanbluesky said:
There the opposite end of the same spectrum to here... both Iran and the West have problems with their understanding of sexuality, the West have indulged it whereas Iran are in denial. Either attitude sucks


How do you define the over-indulgence of sex with the west? No matter how you try to frame it, i beleive it would still be within the borders of "freedom of expression and liberty" and what not.

Gay sex, lesbo sexual act, sex with animal etc all fall within that category. Even the use of sex innuendo to promte stuff in advert is still under that category.

If am given a choice, i would rather take the stance of the west than that of a place that is in denial and appears to follow the stance of barbarian under the pretex of religion.
 
ElRazur said:
How do you define the over-indulgence of sex with the west? No matter how you try to frame it, i beleive it would still be within the borders of "freedom of expression and liberty" and what not.

Gay sex, lesbo sexual act, sex with animal etc all fall within that category. Even the use of sex innuendo to promte stuff in advert is still under that category.

If am given a choice, i would rather take the stance of the west than that of a place that is in denial and appears to follow the stance of barbarian under the pretex of religion.

She knows the law does she not?
 
Few things disgust me but this is one of them. Just shows what a horrible, backwards society the Middle East actually is. Why don't we just give them some rocks so they can stone the fornicator properly instead of all this nancy-pansy Westernised public humiliation and flogging?
And this lot wonder why we question their ability to sensibly manage nuclear power, when they cant even look after their own people in a fair and just manner.
 
M0KUJ1N said:
...when they cant even look after their own people in a fair and just manner.

In that case the West or Isreal shouldn't have such power either.
 
ElRazur said:
How do you define the over-indulgence of sex with the west? No matter how you try to frame it, i beleive it would still be within the borders of "freedom of expression and liberty" and what not.

I'm not talking about things between consenting adults, I'm talking about the media and the attitudes that some people have to sex. I don't think it healthy that some guy's idea of sex is that he put on a mask whilst a bloke behind him gives him a proctology exam with his fist. I can happily sit and watch Aria Giovanni and Jelena Jensen pretending to have lesbian-themed fun... is that sex? Where is the love?

Iran are trying to pretend that people don't want to have sex whereas the West are equally confused dont know what genuine sex is...

Gay sex, lesbo sexual act, sex with animal etc all fall within that category. Even the use of sex innuendo to promte stuff in advert is still under that category.

If am given a choice, i would rather take the stance of the west than that of a place that is in denial and appears to follow the stance of barbarian under the pretex of religion.

Our attitudes once stemmed from religion as well, but that is another story. I am totally for two people who want to discover what their sexuality is about, but I think society in general have some very funny ideas about sexuality, and the pornography industry is NO HELP whatsoever when it comes to this...

Sex is about love
 
cleanbluesky said:
I'm not talking about things between consenting adults, I'm talking about the media and the attitudes that some people have to sex. I don't think it healthy that some guy's idea of sex is that he put on a mask whilst a bloke behind him gives him a proctology exam with his fist. I can happily sit and watch Aria Giovanni and Jelena Jensen pretending to have lesbian-themed fun... is that sex? Where is the love?

Iran are trying to pretend that people don't want to have sex whereas the West are equally confused dont know what genuine sex is...



Our attitudes once stemmed from religion as well, but that is another story. I am totally for two people who want to discover what their sexuality is about, but I think society in general have some very funny ideas about sexuality, and the pornography industry is NO HELP whatsoever when it comes to this...

Sex is about love

I agree there are some odd acts perpetrated in the name of "sex", but as long as they are carried out with mutual consent who am I to to decree who puts what in what hole? To do so would trike me as being hypocritical censorship tbh and just because *I* wouldnt perform certain acts as part of a loving relationship doesn't automatically make them wrong, nor does it necessarily mean they arent an expression of love of some form (you could for instance argue that to let someone carry out an act similar to the one you described requires a great deal of mutual trust)
 
Raz said:
In that case the West or Isreal shouldn't have such power either.

Why? Can you clarify that statement or is it just another "stick up for the muslims" post from you? Hey if you support the way Iran operates why not go live there.
 
Back
Top Bottom