• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Is 1.45v safe for a wolfdale?

Soldato
Joined
26 Apr 2008
Posts
6,653
Location
Bristol, Old Blighty
I've managed to get my E5300 stable at 3.8GHz, but it needs 1.45v to do it. Is that safe? I've heard stories about 45nm chips being damaged if they go above 1.4v. The temperatures are 60C on each core under prime95 small FFTs.

Edit: bah spoke too soon. Prime95 just threw up a rounding error. It needs even MORE volts. FFS :(
 
Last edited:
How much extra volts are required from you going 3.7 to 3.8? If it's loads more then I say it's not worth it as the extra performance you're getting is minimal.
 
What temperature is it at?

I'd consider 1.45V at 50 degrees fine, but 1.4V at 80 degrees to be pushing it too far. As you may have guessed you're rather borderline here
 
Can you afford the £50 to replace it? if so fire away... if not I'd back off to atleast 0.1v below the accepted "safe" level...
 
My max was and still is 1.45. I've heard tales of severe degradation beyond it. Also that is a good clock for that chip, only 200mhz off my E8400
 
3.7 requires 1.4v. That's volts set in BIOS. CPUz reckons the voltage atm is 1.392. I never did work out why CPUz always disagrees with BIOS voltage.
 
Bios voltage is the maximum the board will offer to the chip.

CPU-Z is the voltage currently seen by the chip. Even 'idle' it is less than the maximum because voltage decreases with current and current increases with cpu load, and the cpu is never truely at idle.

The other issue is that neither cpu-z nor the bios is particularly well calibrated, and load line calibration which destroys all this by changing the bios voltage to a target rather than a maximum.
 
Back
Top Bottom