i thought romney looked terrible, but tbh even the greatest guy would look that way when standing up against obama.
obama stuttered a few times, hardly anything major but i guess that may appear as a lack of confidence perhaps. romney seemed to promise the world, without giving away details, and then contradicts himself.
Obama has done nothing but promise the world, he beat Hillary to the democratic nomination by promising to pull out of Iraq the day he takes office, pretty much the day after he got the nomination he was pulling back that "lie", which got him a nobel peace prize simply for saying... which we all knew was impossible. HIllary, Bush and McCain all gave a realistic timeframe for pulling out of Iraq, incidentally the same timeframe obama was giving from around halfway between the nomination and being elected president. Giving a guy a nobel peace prize, for publically making a lie repeatedly, to win an election... before he followed through on pulling out of Iraq, let alone doing it at a later date
What else did Obama promise, a massive push for green power, with some, I forget exactly what, completely ridiculous idea that X% of the US's power usage will come from green power in like 2035. A stupid promise, that is unattainable and couldn't be proven false sill 20 years or so after his potential second term was finished. Even then the goals that were set for this early on have failed to be met.
Everything he is promising is your daft ivy league teenagers ultra liberal stupid view of the world. IE someone in college who gets involved in daft protests and thinks they can completely change everything.... Pie in the sky is one thing as an ideal to aspire to.... we should all want completely green power, its entirely another to PROMISE it in campaigns, its nothing short of lying or delusion.
I can't stand Romney, I can't stand republicans, I can't stand democrats, one actively supports big business, the other lies about it, they both do it. Defense spending has increased significantly under Obama IIRC........
One lies about reasons for being at war, the other denounces it.... yet American's defense spending inreases and Mr Peace Prize is still at war and his army is still killing people around the world daily.
There is the middle where the government is, WANTS to be, and does their work(supporting big business and people staying rich), then there are polarized voters, who either hate business or love business, so the government basically has two completely polar opposite "sides" for the americans to vote for.... while blindly ignoring the same outcomes no matter who they vote for.
It's not that I entirely blame Obama, it wasn't him who made war a business, but it is. England and America will find wars and reasons to get into them, made up or real because defense spending is HUGE in both budgets, if we stopped getting into wars and stopped needing to spend, almost all the defence companies would go out of business... thousands, maybe millions of jobs lost, hit on the economy. Sure less innocent civilians dead in Iraq, and a few more Taliban alive, but of course far less people wanting to join the Taliban in the first place.... but american's would have to find new jobs, and billionaires wouldn't be making so many billions and we can't have that. When War became a business, we were all screwed and global peace became a complete pipedream. While economies rest on defense spending and billionaires who run defence companies have such monumental influence on politics, Iraq won't be even close to the last war started on a lie.
