Is society so backwards that this is disgusting?

Context decides whether something is overtly sexual or not, a woman breast-feeding is not sexual, no more than a woman have a breast exam in a surgery or American/African Native women who routinely only wear lower garments.

That's rational. Customs and related rules and laws are not always rational. I was describing customs and related rules and laws in this country at this time.
 
Why are Jaffa Cakes in the biscuit aisle not the cake aisle?

They're usually treated as biscuits by customers, so shops put them on the biscuit aisle.

They are officially cakes, though - there was a court case and they were ruled to be cakes. It's not as silly as it sounds because a lot of money was involved due to differences in taxation.

If I recall correctly, the the key difference between a cake and a biscuit was ruled to be that a cake goes harder when stale.
 
I think breastfeeding is weird and would not do it with my future children, I think of my breasts as sexual objects rather than motherly ones. There might be health/brain benefits,but my mum never breastfed me and so far I've turned out allright

Its in the comments.

I lol'd.
biscuit biscuit biscuit biscuit biscuit biscuit biscuit biscuit biscuit biscuit biscuit biscuit biscuit biscuit biscuit biscuit biscuit biscuit biscuit biscuit biscuit biscuit biscuit biscuit biscuit biscuit biscuit biscuit biscuit biscuit biscuit biscuit biscuit biscuit biscuit biscuit biscuit biscuit biscuit biscuit biscuit biscuit biscuit biscuit biscuit biscuit biscuit biscuit biscuit biscuit biscuit biscuit biscuit biscuit biscuit biscuit biscuit biscuit biscuit biscuit biscuit biscuit biscuit biscuit biscuit biscuit biscuit biscuit biscuit biscuit biscuit biscuit biscuit biscuit biscuit biscuit biscuit biscuit biscuit biscuit biscuit biscuit biscuit biscuit

:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D
 
it is in no way sexual and I do not think the nipple is visible anyway even without the pixelation, not that it would make it sexual even if it was.

Seems a huge outrage fuelled by the Daily Mail and it's ilk for no other reason than to sell copy.

Hmm. I disagree, but it's really over Kraft's intent. I think you'd agree if it was intended to be sexual then it'd be wrong, otherwise it'd be ok. I think they intended it to be sexual. Perhaps it's because the breast is rather an attractive one.. I'm not sure. I'm certainly cynical about it.

It *is* however the Daily Mail stirring up hate, as per usual. It happens in these forums too... some poster comes up with a thread saying "OMG send them to prison and torture them lol" and out of nowhere the reactionaries appear explaining why they're really butthurt about the verdict or whatever and how they should be tortured and killed....
 
Back
Top Bottom