ISIL, ISIS, Daesh discussion thread.

Rroff said:
He seems to find plenty of energy to band insults at people when they won't just swallow his narrative unquestioned.
Click to expand...
Given its post count and history, I suspect it's either an old member who was permabanned and reregistered or a spam bot :D

<200 posts, on a computer forum, and all so very passionately presented. Suspect.
 
Amnesia said:
You do care about the situation in Syria, its why you never leave. You're always there in the background looking upset throwing in the odd comment which really just asks remember me?
Click to expand...
Comprehension skills: 0
I was replying to your attempt at humour about me caring about your opinion. I don't. Come on, keep up. Your instant James Bond and such like responses since my question about why you care is telling. I've called you out, you can't answer. You're right, I do care about Syria, it implicates me and what I have to do in my life daily. You on the other hand are a keyboard warrior dwelling on a forum with no answers to pointed questions. You're just another virtue signalling cretin.
Smokey Deza said:
He's just bitter because he's been utterly demolished by EvilSooty and he hasn't got the brain matter to challenge him.
Click to expand...
By utterly demolished you mean constantly repeating the same thing, like it was his own revelation? "THE WHITE HELMETS ARE FUNDED BY A BRIT!!!1".

Stick to smoking weed and talking tripe kid. You're doing well.
 
h4rm0ny said:
It's strange that your belief in humanity is so low, that when you see someone who cares about mass deaths you can't see it as anything other than virtue signalling. And demand proof of offline activities - presumably pushing American tanks backwards out of Iraq or something - to demonstrate to your satisfaction that they do. Does it not occur to you that countering lies and disinformation is an action?

And all the time you keep on posting how you don't care at all as if that is some kind of virtue.
Click to expand...
You misunderstood.

Words are cheap. You know the concept of virtue signalling. It's very easy to sit, post and posture. It's hilarious how many morally superior, jumped up little cretins that I find myself drawn into arguments with when the reality is they haven't the foggiest idea what they're really talking about. They've not been there, they're not involved at all and they hoover up third hand biased information and regurgitate it like it's fact and like they're making some kind of revelation when they do.

So I've quite simply stopped caring about those people and their opinions.

And it is virtue signalling, because if they really did care, they'd get off the Internet and take real measures to counter their rich, oil fueled lifestyle. Hypocrites!
 
h4rm0ny said:
I see. And what measures should I be taking which I'm not, in order to meet your standard for being able to make factual criticisms in public? Deeply curious.
Click to expand...
So again, you're diverting the discussion away from the point in the first place....

RoboCod said:
Tell me why you care so much and then tell me why your cares don't extend to all nations across the world. Why Syria in particular? Go on, show me really how much you care, and not just by some words on a forum that don't matter.
Click to expand...

Go on.
 
Amnesia said:
Sure.....

i guess its why you're still here, .
Click to expand...

Well I did create the thread... *shrug*

You repeatedly live up to your username. It's alright, I asked a question you didn't like and couldn't answer. You've since retorted with wise cracks. It's brilliant :D
h4rm0ny said:
I think whilst RoboCod's weaponised nihilism has provided a bit of welcome comic relief to the thread, it's pretty much a sideshow to the more substantive and productive back and forth with Rroff and others. So though I still await Robocod's answer to what exactly I should be doing that I'm not, I'm not going to hold my breath or invest much more in this.
Click to expand...
I'll answer questions when the one I asked first is answered.
 
h4rm0ny said:
But I'm trying to answer your question. :D Tell me what it is that you think I need to be doing that I'm not in order to be suitable to comment here and I'll be able to tell you if I'm doing them or not. Also, isn't it rather petty to refuse to answer? It's a very simple question. Or are we going to have a repeat here with us going round and round with you finding ways and reasons not to answer it.
Click to expand...
So the answer to a question is to respond with a question? Ha. Are you a politician?
 
Amnesia said:
So what?

Are you really going to sit here for the rest of your life calling people cretins and burst out into tears when they type something you dont like...all at the same time unconvincingly claiming you dont care.

Its just a thread, get over it and move on.
Besides doesn't 007 have a world to save and 100's of women to please.
Click to expand...
Yes, I'm balling my eyes out here :D :D

Gets asked a question, doesn't like question, resorts to ad hominem. Who is the one crying, really? Haha. You're scared.
 
EvilSooty said:
Anyway, it's now over two weeks since the leaked OPCW report that pretty much confirms that the alleged chemical weapons attack in Syria last year in Douma was a lie and that we bombed Syria illegally risking war with Russia on the word of jihadis and the White Helmets whom our government funds.

To date in the corporate and state BBC press there has only been a single article from Robert Fisk of the Independent and a series of articles from Peter Hitchens of the Mail on Sunday reporting this.

Compares this to the hundreds of articles spreading the lie from the time.

Of course the independent media (Morning Star, Consortium News, Zero Hedge etc) along with the Russian press have reported this extensively.

What a ******* disgrace. A media blackout on a report this important when the same corporate hacks immediately report evidence-free claims from Al Qaeda in Idlib that they were gassed a few days ago.

Zero from the BBC who did countlees articles about Douma. Nothing to say now when it has been shown to be a hoax.

Convenient.

The leaked report, which has gone into the memory hole, is linked to here.

http://syriapropagandamedia.org/wor...lleged-chemical-attack-in-douma-in-april-2018
Click to expand...
Interesting when you dig into the "doctors" and "professors" who publish these reports. One shining example, Vanessa Beeley.

Interesting that their own page has to state

The group is entirely independent, open to academics and independent researchers and is not aligned to any state or non-state actor. In line with ethical expectations, the research group is committed to the upholding of international law and human rights norms.
Click to expand...

I mean, really? And who doesn't have an agenda anyway?

Interesting that you seem to be spamming/regurtitating in the thread with similar propaganda. I wonder if you have a vested interest like these "professors" or that you're just another person being sucked into the whirlwind of misinformation.


#wokeAF... Right?
 
"irrelevant" :D :D too funny.

I could do this all day. Let me know when you want to look into the backgrounds of every other "professor" on that site.

It would be good if you were associated somehow, that would make for a more interesting discussion. However, I suspect you're just another WOKE individual, bent on reposting their cack (not that interesting).
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom