"Initial reports of a £10m fee gave way to one in the region of £7.5m-£8m plus the inevitable add-ons. As to whether there's a release clause, we'll have to wait for the next Tottenham press conference to find that out..."
lol
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3c2e7/3c2e7078a9869e9d518813af2d0fa6f2837eea4d" alt="Big Grin :D :D"
"Initial reports of a £10m fee gave way to one in the region of £7.5m-£8m plus the inevitable add-ons. As to whether there's a release clause, we'll have to wait for the next Tottenham press conference to find that out..."
"Initial reports of a £10m fee gave way to one in the region of £7.5m-£8m plus the inevitable add-ons. As to whether there's a release clause, we'll have to wait for the next Tottenham press conference to find that out..."
Great news. His record speaks for itself.
We still need a defender and midfielder though, flash the cash some Cashley!
Yes really.really?
I cant imagine it being near 47m but if it is then if we are getting 50% of that back plus what he did for us whilst he was playing it isn't such a bad deal.It didn't get a great deal of coverage at the time and I have to say that I hadn't picked up on it until it was reported again recently but reportedly he cost considerably more than £25.5m.
The £25.5m figure was talked about because David Gill confirmed that's what Utd had agreed to pay as part of their deal when they initially loaned him. That wasn't necessarily the asking price once Tevez rejected the offer to stay at Utd though. The Times, Independent and Guardain all reported that the fee that City paid could be as much as £47m.
[DOD]Asprilla;21055396 said:Midfielder?
Cabaye, Ben Arfa, Jonas, Tiote, .
Yes really.
How do you think that as a club we are being stupid.
Those are the good ones, rest are filler. We need better players if we want to stay where we are.
Guthrie did extremely well when Tiote hurt his knee. Am a big fan of Vukic good player for his age
They aren't bad (especially Vukic who could prove to be very good), they are PL standard but if we are wanting to stay top 7 then we need players of a better calibre who are able to step into the breech.
Had this been anybody other than City they'd be getting praised for standing their ground.
I see where you coming frombut imo its not a priority. We seemed to have got a proven goal scorer in, just hope Ba not leaving could be a deadly partnership
![]()
Defender is needed badly
Do we still have xisco on our wage bill? Think he went out on loan again. Him and Smith off our wage bill would be massive and would open more places in our squad. (over 100k a week I believe)
Any other club would have made sure Tevez was sold in the summer given he spent much of the previous year making it plainly clear he wanted to leave. Should City be praised for keeping him in an attempt to get his supposed market value? Not in my opinion. In this case you simply have to take a loss.
Arsenal didn't get what they probably should have done for Fabregas but ultimately they didn't really have a choice but to sell for what the buying club were willing to spend, City are no different..... well actually that's not true City could let Tevez walk away for free and it wouldn't impact them whatsoever
Vastly reduced wages but he is picking up a wage because otherwise he will sue us.Because you've got a player who doesn't want to play for you back in Argentina playing golf still picking up his monthy wage packet. Name another club in the world that would find themselves in that situation? Do you really think Tevez would behave the way he is now were he still at United?
Tevez is making City looks like clowns and while you keep him on your books you've got your manager having to answer questions about him in every single press conference.
And the fact that you're holding out for a deal which suits City when you're a club that obviously doesn't need the transfer fee is even more bizarre.
Yeah, but the point is, what's to stop the next unhappy player then kicking up a similar fuss, knowing he'll get to walk away on a free and claim a tasty signing-on bonus somewhere else?Arsenal didn't get what they probably should have done for Fabregas but ultimately they didn't really have a choice but to sell for what the buying club were willing to spend, City are no different..... well actually that's not true City could let Tevez walk away for free and it wouldn't impact them whatsoever
While Tevez was continuing to do his job on the pitch then there was no need for City or any other club to sell him in the summer unless somebody matched their fee. Just like Spurs didn't sell Modric as soon as he asked to leave (and he kicked up a fuss about playing too) and Utd didn't with Rooney either.
The situation changed once he refused to play but still, why bow down to Tevez if the money is of no importance to them? The reason why Arsenal sold and why most other clubs eventually sell is because of money, that doesn't matter to City.
Yeah, but the point is, what's to stop the next unhappy player then kicking up a similar fuss, knowing he'll get to walk away on a free and claim a tasty signing-on bonus somewhere else?