January Transfer Window 2012/2013 Season Rumours/Signings

Plenty on here, not just Newcastle supporters, claimed he was in line for an England call up last season and was far better than Johnson :confused:

I for one hope I dint say anything like that lol.

hmm I remember last year he got awful abuse off twitter from Newcastle fans that he stopped tweeting :D

Ran up the wing, give ball away, fell flat on his face, other team scored, faked injury.
 
I love it when players royally **** up then just gamble on faking injury. Wasn't it Dida who got banned for something like that, even getting a stretcher on...?
 
Heard a rumour that Lescott is going back to Everton on effectively a free. We still owe them money from his original transfer and for the Rodwell deal so our debts will be wiped as our payment basically.
We eventually will have to pay Everton so pointless selling him elsewhere and then pocketing the money.
 
What has Lescott done to fall out of favour so quickly? He was really solid alongside Kompany last year was he not?
 
What has Lescott done to fall out of favour so quickly? He was really solid alongside Kompany last year was he not?
He hasn't done anything. It's just Nastasic is better at everything than Lescott except probably heading. Even then Nastasic has a near perfect % of winning headers so...

Nastasic is far more comfortable with the ball and a lot quicker than Lescott which Mancini/most fans want hence why he has played so much. Lescott isn't getting any younger and is on huge wages as well so unfortunately there is not a lot going for him to stay.

I can't see him leaving until we have at least brought in another CB. Kolo will be leaving in the summer and Richards is forever injured. We can't rely on Rodwell either to slot in nor Garcia, both of which would be far better utilized in midfield anyway. So we need to bring in another CB really if we are letting Lescott and Kolo leave.
 
Just out of interest isnt there something about English U21 players not requiring a squad space (Fryers is barely 20 years old)

Almost, as I said the nationality is irrelevant (you could have 100 Brazillians if you wanted) and the rule is if you were u21 when the calendar year started then you don't take a squad space for the season starting that year. It's why I didn't list Caulker in their list of alternates.

This is great for someone like Wilshere who was born 01/01/92 because it means he still won't take a squad place even next season, as he was aged only 20 at the start of 2013 :)
 
I didn't think Chamakh was a bad player when he was actually given a game :(

I did some analysis a while back basically highlighting the fact that he started well deputising for RvP, had a barren December and then basically hardly ever got to play more than 45mins. People had these great stats they were rolling out about how he's scored 1 goal in 20 appearances or whatever but it was a bit misleading because he never got any starts in the second half of the season.

He's often slow to get into games e.g. the 7-5 game against Reading if I recall he was pony in the first half but then actually played pretty decent in the secon d hour of the game. Problem is if you throw him on for 10mins here or 20mins there he doesn't get up to speed.

Here you go found my quote from the end of April 2011:

Does annoy me a bit the way Chamakh gets bashed for his form/goal scoring record. The simple fact is he has not been given a single start in the league this year. He literally hasn't been in the pitch in the first half of ANY league match this year. In the fact the only game in which he was given more than half an hour, he got an assist. He's played a total of 154mins this year (plus injury time), or less than the equivalent of two matches.

OK fair enough he did go off the boil a bit in December, but in his first season in the league that is understandable given the workload he'd been given with RvP being out injured (more minutes than any other Arsenal player at the time I think). And up to the end of November he had a decent return of 7 goals in the league.

But these stats that get rolled out, oh Chamakh hasn't scored for x number of games, well the last 7 of those have all been secondhalf appearances, 5mins here, 11mins there - hardly surprisingly his goals have dried up.
 
He's a decent enough player and outside of his goals/assists in his first several months his interplay was decent and improving and he was generally a decent player. RVP also wasn't injured for that long in the first 6 months but Wenger randomly(as he does) decided that Chamakh wasn't a first team player and never gave him a decent chance after xmas, and the season after he joined onwards was basically shafted, like Arshavin and plenty of other players.

The two reasons he was a particularly bad buy are a free transfer meaning higher than normal wage, higher than what he was worth, meaning the MANY offers we've had for him since Wenger's been trying to get rid of him haven't come close to matching his now overpriced wage(had we bought him for 8 mil on 40k a week, we could likely have sold him for the same price a year later saving a shedload of money), the other problem being Wenger had Bendtner, who is basically better than Chamakh in each area of his game, and he was already shafting him, and Vela, and Walcott, and Arshavin and the list goes on. There was never a chance he'd be anythign other than short term cover for an injured RVP.. and we were paying through the teeth for short term cover that we couldn't then get rid of..... at a club that didn't have a "big man upfront" type available, at a club that would happily use a player like that, buying him would make sense, at a club where the manager never really wants to play a guy like that, and where we had a better player of that type, it was a mental buy.

The question of if he can do well at West Ham is, difficult, you sit on the bench for three years.... some players come out hungry and move on after a difficult period and do great, others become lazy money sapping bums who put in no effort at all(Joe Cole).

Also depends on Carlton Cole and Carroll, not entirely sure when Carroll is supposed to be back from injury, and Cole isn't scoring enough but is still a beast who can dominate defences. Will be interesting to see how many games he gets, if he's given a run I think he'll come good.
 
Benat to City or Chelsea?

http://soccernet.espn.go.com/news/story?id=1287602

Would take him all day long at Chelsea; he's awesome.
Would love him at City.

We have no one outside of Yaya that can pass the ball further than 10yrds in midfield. To be fair Barry has actually been doing really well going forward recently but still a player like Benat would be perfect.

Just seen Fiorentina have signed Giuseppe Rossi, possibly opening the door for Jovetic to leave. I would love him at City. Comfortable in different positions and if we assume Balotelli doesn't have long left at City we could well be bringing him in.

EDIT: Fergie isn't happy about Spurs signing Fryers. Want's it to be investigated :confused:
 
Last edited:
Would love him at City.

We have no one outside of Yaya that can pass the ball further than 10yrds in midfield. To be fair Barry has actually been doing really well going forward recently but still a player like Benat would be perfect.

Just seen Fiorentina have signed Giuseppe Rossi, possibly opening the door for Jovetic to leave. I would love him at City. Comfortable in different positions and if we assume Balotelli doesn't have long left at City we could well be bringing him in.

Rossi won't be playing football for several months still, and could turn out to not get any form back at all after two huge ligament injuries and being out for a long time.

So I wouldn't count on Jovetic being gone soon.
 
Someone explain to me this spurs situation please. I fail to see anything wrong with it from my current understanding :confused:.

Spurs try to sign Fryers in summer. He was out of contract at United but the rules dictate if another UK club signs an under 23 then they must pay an appropriate level of compensation. United were holding out for £6m which Spurs said they could not afford. Fryers then signs for Standard Liege who pay United a smaller amount of compensation as they are subject to different compensation rules. 6 months later he signs for Spurs.

I would venture that the £3m Spurs paid Standard Liege comfortably covered the compensation paid to United, his wages for the intervening period and something on top for their trouble, keeping Standard happy and saving Spurs up to £3m.
 
Someone explain to me this spurs situation please. I fail to see anything wrong with it from my current understanding :confused:.
He left on a free to Standard Leige and I think fergie is trying to say that Spurs had a deal in place with him but didn't want to pay any compensation fee so instead let him go to Standard Liege and then a year later buy him for half of the price that he would have cost in compensation and he has had a year of playing football.
 
Back
Top Bottom