Called what? He is a child. That is my problem with all this. If American states want to allow people to kill others in self defence that is their business. My issue is allowing children to walk the streets with a weapon of war.
Dealt with this nonsence already...
I have considerable doubt in the implied suggestion that would have been much more at ease with the situation if the only difference was that Kyle Rittenhouse was an older adult rather than a 17-year old teenager.
It's much like the 'crossing state lines' and 'wearing gloves' stuff which appears just to be noise to get away from the key facts.